Woods A W, MacKirdy F N, Livingston B M, Norrie J, Howie J C
Department of Anaesthetics, Victoria Infirmary, Langside Road, Glasgow, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2000 Nov;55(11):1058-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01552.x.
The most recent edition of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation provides a prediction of intensive care unit length of stay in addition to the probability of hospital mortality. Intensive care length of stay is an important determinant of intensive care costs and may be an important indicator of quality of care. Data were collected from 22 Scottish intensive care units over a 2-year period to allow comparison of actual intensive care unit length of stay with that predicted by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III system. Correlation between actual and predicted stay for individual patients was poor. However, performance of the model for patients, grouped either by predicted length of stay or by intensive care unit, indicated that the model stratified patient groups appropriately while demonstrating a consistent bias. Length of stay in Scottish intensive care units was found to be consistently lower than that predicted by a model which is based on intensive care practice in the USA. Variations in severity of illness in intensive care unit populations cannot readily explain differences in intensive care unit length of stay. The availability of a model capable of predicting length of intensive care stay, based on data reflecting practice in the UK, would compliment current methods of assessing effectiveness of intensive care.
最新版的《急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估》除了能预测医院死亡率外,还能预测重症监护病房的住院时长。重症监护病房的住院时长是重症监护成本的重要决定因素,也可能是护理质量的重要指标。在两年时间里,从22个苏格兰重症监护病房收集了数据,以便将实际的重症监护病房住院时长与《急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III》系统预测的时长进行比较。个体患者实际住院时长与预测住院时长之间的相关性较差。然而,该模型对患者的表现,无论是按预测住院时长分组还是按重症监护病房分组,都表明该模型在适当分层患者群体的同时,也显示出了一致的偏差。结果发现,苏格兰重症监护病房的住院时长始终低于基于美国重症监护实践的模型所预测的时长。重症监护病房患者病情严重程度的差异并不能轻易解释重症监护病房住院时长的差异。基于反映英国实践的数据,有一个能够预测重症监护住院时长的模型,将有助于补充当前评估重症监护有效性的方法。