Nixon M C
Department of Anaesthetics, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London WC1N 3JH, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2000 Nov;55(11):1076-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01616.x.
All anaesthetic trainees must maintain a logbook. The recent extension of Specialist Registrar training from 4 to 5 years, granted by the Specialist Training Authority, is conditional upon a change to competency-based training. The Royal College of Anaesthetists defines competency as possession of the 'trinity' of knowledge, skills and attitudes. This raises the question of whether the present logbook is of value in recording training. I surveyed a national cohort of trainees to investigate the current logbook: how it is being used, its value and its shortcomings. All respondents kept logbooks, but 81% and 69% experienced problems recording subspecialty experience in Intensive Care and Pain, respectively. Less than 50% regularly analysed their logbooks and for 67% of Specialist Registrars, no (or minimal) attention was paid to the logbook at assessments. Overwhelmingly, 97% did not believe that the current logbook assessed competency. The value of Training Portfolios is discussed.
所有麻醉专业实习生都必须保留一本日志。专科培训管理局最近将专科住院医师培训从4年延长至5年,其条件是转向基于能力的培训。皇家麻醉师学院将能力定义为具备知识、技能和态度的“三位一体”。这就提出了一个问题,即目前的日志在记录培训方面是否有价值。我对全国一批实习生进行了调查,以研究当前的日志:它是如何被使用的、它的价值以及它的缺点。所有受访者都保留日志,但分别有81%和69%的人在记录重症监护和疼痛亚专业经验时遇到问题。不到50%的人定期分析他们的日志,对于67%的专科住院医师来说,在评估时没有(或很少)关注日志。绝大多数人(97%)认为当前的日志无法评估能力。文中还讨论了培训档案袋的价值。