• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种使用受精鸡蛋评估抗蛇毒血清(半数有效剂量)的体内无感觉模型。

An in vivo but insensate model for the evaluation of antivenoms (ED(50)) using fertile hens' eggs.

作者信息

Sells P G, Laing G D, Theakston R D

机构信息

Alistair Reid Venom Research Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, L3 5QA, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Toxicon. 2001 May;39(5):665-8. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(00)00191-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0041-0101(00)00191-4
PMID:11072045
Abstract

The preclinical evaluation of the efficacy of new antivenoms (ED(50)) in animals is required by international regulatory authorities. In vitro testing alone does not provide the end point of lethality of a living system which is essential for an antivenom to prevent. Large numbers of mice are injected with venom/antivenom mixtures and the number of surviving mice is statistically analysed to give an ED(50) value reflecting the efficacy of that antivenom. Our objective was to develop a humane alternative to the conventional rodent ED(50) test using fertile hens' eggs. The egg test combines the advantages of an in vivo system, which gives a clear end point for haemorrhage and lethality, with the certain knowledge that no distress can be experienced by the embryo which is insensate at day 6 of development. Nine different, medically-important venoms and antivenoms were tested by both the rodent and egg ED(50) assays. A good correlation between the two tests was obtained (p<0.01) suggesting that the egg ED(50) method should be considered as an alternative to the rodent ED(50) test for non-neurotoxic venoms. Use of the egg ED(50) test would substantially reduce both the numbers of experimental animals required and also the considerable costs involved in delivering improved clinical treatment of snakebite.

摘要

国际监管机构要求对新型抗蛇毒血清在动物体内的疗效进行临床前评估(半数有效剂量[ED(50)])。仅体外试验无法提供抗蛇毒血清所必需预防的活体系统致死终点。给大量小鼠注射毒液/抗蛇毒血清混合物,并对存活小鼠数量进行统计分析,以得出反映该抗蛇毒血清疗效的ED(50)值。我们的目标是开发一种人道的替代方法,以取代使用可育鸡蛋的传统啮齿动物ED(50)试验。鸡蛋试验结合了体内系统的优点,该系统能给出出血和致死的明确终点,同时明确知道发育到第6天的胚胎没有感觉,不会遭受痛苦。通过啮齿动物和鸡蛋ED(50)试验对9种不同的、具有医学重要性的毒液和抗蛇毒血清进行了测试。两种试验之间获得了良好的相关性(p<0.01),这表明对于非神经毒性毒液,鸡蛋ED(50)方法应被视为啮齿动物ED(50)试验的替代方法。使用鸡蛋ED(50)试验将大幅减少所需实验动物的数量,以及在提供改进的蛇咬伤临床治疗方面所涉及的可观成本。

相似文献

1
An in vivo but insensate model for the evaluation of antivenoms (ED(50)) using fertile hens' eggs.一种使用受精鸡蛋评估抗蛇毒血清(半数有效剂量)的体内无感觉模型。
Toxicon. 2001 May;39(5):665-8. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(00)00191-4.
2
Preclinical antivenom-efficacy testing reveals potentially disturbing deficiencies of snakebite treatment capability in East Africa.临床前抗蛇毒血清疗效测试揭示了东非地区蛇伤治疗能力的潜在令人不安的缺陷。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Oct 18;11(10):e0005969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005969. eCollection 2017 Oct.
3
Tests for Assessing the Neutralizing Ability of Snake Antivenoms: Toward the 3Rs Principles.评估蛇抗蛇毒血清中和能力的检测方法:朝着 3R 原则发展。
Front Immunol. 2021 Jan 11;11:617429. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.617429. eCollection 2020.
4
A humane alternative to the measurement of the lethal effects (LD50) of non-neurotoxic venoms using hens' eggs.一种使用鸡蛋来测定非神经毒性毒液致死效应(半数致死量,LD50)的人道替代方法。
Toxicon. 1998 Jul;36(7):985-91. doi: 10.1016/s0041-0101(98)00004-x.
5
Assessing the preclinical efficacy of antivenoms: from the lethality neutralization assay to antivenomics.评估抗蛇毒血清的临床前疗效:从致死性中和测定到抗蛇毒组学。
Toxicon. 2013 Jul;69:168-79. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
6
Preclinical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Antivenoms for Snakebite Envenoming: State-of-the-Art and Challenges Ahead.抗蛇毒血清治疗蛇咬伤中毒疗效的临床前评估:现状与未来挑战
Toxins (Basel). 2017 May 13;9(5):163. doi: 10.3390/toxins9050163.
7
Preclinical assessment of the neutralizing efficacy of snake antivenoms in Latin America and the Caribbean: A review.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区蛇毒抗血清中和效力的临床前评估:综述
Toxicon. 2018 May;146:138-150. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.02.053. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
8
Comparison of the potency of three Brazilian Bothrops antivenoms using in vivo rodent and in vitro assays. BIASG (Butantan Institute Antivenom Study Group).使用体内啮齿动物和体外试验比较三种巴西矛头蝮抗蛇毒血清的效力。BIASG(布坦坦研究所抗蛇毒血清研究小组)。
Toxicon. 1992 Oct;30(10):1219-25. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(92)90438-b.
9
Potency Testing of Venoms and Antivenoms in Embryonated Eggs: An Ethical Alternative to Animal Testing.在鸡胚中进行毒液和抗毒液效价测定:动物试验的一种伦理替代方法。
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;13(4):233. doi: 10.3390/toxins13040233.
10
Omics meets biology: application to the design and preclinical assessment of antivenoms.组学与生物学相遇:在抗蛇毒血清设计及临床前评估中的应用
Toxins (Basel). 2014 Dec 15;6(12):3388-405. doi: 10.3390/toxins6123388.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving   assays in snake venom and antivenom research: A community discussion.提高蛇毒和抗蛇毒研究中的检测方法:一次社区讨论。
F1000Res. 2024 Mar 15;13:192. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.148223.1. eCollection 2024.
2
Potency Testing of Venoms and Antivenoms in Embryonated Eggs: An Ethical Alternative to Animal Testing.在鸡胚中进行毒液和抗毒液效价测定:动物试验的一种伦理替代方法。
Toxins (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;13(4):233. doi: 10.3390/toxins13040233.
3
Tests for Assessing the Neutralizing Ability of Snake Antivenoms: Toward the 3Rs Principles.
评估蛇抗蛇毒血清中和能力的检测方法:朝着 3R 原则发展。
Front Immunol. 2021 Jan 11;11:617429. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.617429. eCollection 2020.
4
An in vitro α-neurotoxin-nAChR binding assay correlates with lethality and in vivo neutralization of a large number of elapid neurotoxic snake venoms from four continents.一种体外α-神经毒素-nAChR 结合测定法与来自四大洲的大量毒蛇神经毒素的致死性和体内中和作用相关。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Aug 28;14(8):e0008581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008581. eCollection 2020 Aug.
5
Target-Specificity in Scorpions; Comparing Lethality of Scorpion Venoms across Arthropods and Vertebrates.蝎子的靶向特异性;比较蝎子毒液对节肢动物和脊椎动物的致死性。
Toxins (Basel). 2017 Oct 4;9(10):312. doi: 10.3390/toxins9100312.
6
Coral snake antivenom produced in chickens (Gallus domesticus).鸡(家鸡)生产的珊瑚蛇抗蛇毒血清。
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2014 Jan-Feb;56(1):61-6. doi: 10.1590/S0036-46652014000100009.