Runeson B, Scocco P, DeLeo D, Meneghel G, Wasserman D
Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Section for Psychiatry, St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000 Nov-Dec;22(6):432-6. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(00)00107-9.
The aim of the study was to compare the management of suicide attempts by patients in Sweden and Italy with a view to providing a perspective on differences in treatment. Two consecutive samples of suicide attempters from Huddinge (n=97) and Padua (n=100) were studied in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, previous care, referral, medical and psychiatric care, hospitalization, aftercare, and short-term compliance. In Italian somatic management of acute suicidal crises, there are more physicians specializing in anesthesia or internal medicine working in ambulances and emergency wards, and there is a heavier emphasis on somatic care. Swedish management procedures seem to entail more medical examinations and biohumoral tests. Moreover, the procedures at the Swedish hospital give priority to early psychiatric intervention, and admission to psychiatric inpatient care is more frequent. However, it is not normal practice in emergency psychiatric care at either of the centers for specialists to serve in the immediate liaison consultation. There are differences in assessment and treatment between the two countries that may provide a perspective on their procedures, implying that current procedures for managing patients belonging to groups identified as "high-risk" in terms of suicide may be modified.
本研究的目的是比较瑞典和意大利患者自杀未遂的处理情况,以便了解治疗差异。对来自胡丁厄(n = 97)和帕多瓦(n = 100)的两组连续自杀未遂者样本进行了研究,内容包括社会人口学特征、既往护理、转诊、医疗和精神科护理、住院治疗、后续护理以及短期依从性。在意大利,急性自杀危机的躯体处理方面,有更多麻醉或内科专科医生在救护车和急诊病房工作,且更注重躯体护理。瑞典的处理程序似乎需要更多的医学检查和生物体液检测。此外,瑞典医院的程序优先考虑早期精神科干预,精神科住院治疗更为频繁。然而,在这两个中心的急诊精神科护理中,专家进行即时联络会诊并非惯例。两国在评估和治疗方面存在差异,这可能为其程序提供一个视角,意味着当前针对被认定为自杀“高危”群体患者的处理程序可能需要修改。