Suppr超能文献

急诊科工作场所的干扰:急诊医生是“受干扰驱动”和“多任务处理”的吗?

Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians "interrupt-driven" and "multitasking"?

作者信息

Chisholm C D, Collison E K, Nelson D R, Cordell W H

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Methodist Hospital, Clarian Health Partners, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Nov;7(11):1239-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00469.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although interruptions have been shown in aviation and other work settings to result in error with serious and sometimes fatal consequences, little is known about interruptions in the emergency department (ED). The authors conducted an observational, time-motion task-analysis study to determine the number and types of interruptions in the ED.

METHODS

Emergency physicians were observed in three EDs located in an urban teaching hospital, a suburban private teaching hospital, and a rural community hospital. A single investigator followed emergency staff physicians for 180-minute periods and recorded tasks, interruptions, and breaks-intask. An "interruption" was defined as any event that briefly required the attention of the subject but did not result in switching to a new task. A "break-intask" was defined as an event that required the attention of the physician for more than 10 seconds and subsequently resulted in changing tasks.

RESULTS

The mean (+/-SD) total number of patients seen at all three sites during the 180-minute study period was 12.1 +/- 3.7 patients (range 5-20). Physicians performed a mean of 67.6 +/- 15.7 tasks per study period. The mean number of interruptions per 180-minute study period was 30.9 +/- 9.7 and the mean number of breaks-in-task was 20.7 +/- 6.3. Both the number of interruptions (r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and the number of breaks-in-task (r = 0.56; p < 0.001) per observation period were positively correlated with the average number of patients simultaneously managed.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency physicians are "interruptdriven." Emergency physicians are frequently interrupted and many interruptions result in breaks-in-task.

摘要

目的

尽管在航空及其他工作环境中,干扰已被证明会导致错误,产生严重甚至有时是致命的后果,但对于急诊科(ED)中的干扰情况却知之甚少。作者开展了一项观察性的时间动作任务分析研究,以确定急诊科中的干扰数量及类型。

方法

在一家城市教学医院、一家郊区私立教学医院和一家农村社区医院的三个急诊科对急诊医生进行观察。一名调查员对急诊医生进行180分钟的跟踪观察,记录任务、干扰及任务中断情况。“干扰”被定义为任何短暂需要受试者关注但未导致切换到新任务的事件。“任务中断”被定义为需要医生关注超过10秒并随后导致任务改变的事件。

结果

在180分钟的研究期间,所有三个地点接诊的患者平均总数为12.1±3.7名患者(范围为5 - 20名)。每位医生在每个研究期间平均执行67.6±15.7项任务。每180分钟研究期间的平均干扰次数为30.9±9.7次,平均任务中断次数为20.7±6.3次。每个观察期的干扰次数(r = 0.63;p < 0.001)和任务中断次数(r = 0.56;p < 0.001)均与同时处理的患者平均数量呈正相关。

结论

急诊医生是“受干扰驱动的”。急诊医生经常受到干扰,且许多干扰会导致任务中断。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验