Liew A S, Johnson J A, Patterson S D, King G J, Chess D G
Bioengineering Laboratory, St Joseph's Health Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000 Sep-Oct;9(5):423-6. doi: 10.1067/mse.2000.107089.
The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the most advantageous screw locations within the humeral head when plate and screw fixation is to be used and (2) to determine the effect of positioning the screw tip abutting the subchondral bone. Ten paired humeral heads were harvested with a monoplanar cut through the anatomic neck. Through use of a standardized template, 7 holes were drilled and tapped in each specimen for insertion of 6.5-mm fully threaded cancellous screws perpendicular to the plane of the cut. Paired specimens were randomized into 2 groups, one with the screw purchase in central cancellous bone and the other with the screw purchase up to the subchondral bone. Each screw was pulled out axially at a displacement rate of 10 mm/min through use of a servohydraulic testing machine. The length of thread purchase, position within the head, and screw pullout load to failure were recorded. The normalized pullout force to failure was calculated by dividing absolute pullout force to failure by length of screw purchase. Data were analyzed by means of a 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance and post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test. The central position had a significantly higher absolute pullout force to failure than all other sites (P < .05). By virtue of the humeral head shape, the central position also had a significantly greater length of screw purchase than all other positions (P < .05). The central position had a significantly higher relative pullout force to failure than all other positions (P < .05). Subchondral bone abutment positioning improved both the absolute and the relative pullout forces to failure (P < .05). When screws and plates are used in open reduction and internal fixation of a proximal humerus fracture, a major mode of failure is loss of fixation within the humeral head. On the basis of this study, optimal screw purchase with respect to bone fixation can be achieved by including screws located in the center of the humeral head in the subchondral abutment position. To minimize screw fixation failure, the anterosuperior position should be avoided. The pattern of distribution of the relative pullout force as measured in this study is consistent with previous observational studies of patterns of trabecular density within the humeral head.
(1)确定在使用钢板螺钉固定时肱骨头内最有利的螺钉位置;(2)确定将螺钉尖端抵接软骨下骨的效果。通过在解剖颈处进行单平面切割,获取了10对肱骨头。使用标准化模板,在每个标本上钻出7个孔并攻丝,以便垂直于切割平面插入6.5毫米全螺纹松质骨螺钉。将配对的标本随机分为两组,一组螺钉植入中央松质骨,另一组螺钉植入至软骨下骨。通过伺服液压试验机,以10毫米/分钟的位移速率轴向拔出每个螺钉。记录螺纹植入长度、在肱骨头内的位置以及螺钉拔出至失效的载荷。通过将绝对拔出至失效力除以螺钉植入长度来计算归一化拔出至失效力。采用双向重复测量方差分析和事后Student-Newman-Keuls检验对数据进行分析。中央位置的绝对拔出至失效力显著高于所有其他位置(P <.05)。由于肱骨头的形状,中央位置的螺钉植入长度也显著大于所有其他位置(P <.05)。中央位置的相对拔出至失效力显著高于所有其他位置(P <.05)。软骨下骨抵接定位改善了绝对和相对拔出至失效力(P <.05)。当在肱骨近端骨折的切开复位内固定中使用螺钉和钢板时,主要的失效模式是肱骨头内固定的丧失。基于本研究,通过将位于肱骨头中心的螺钉置于软骨下抵接位置,可以实现关于骨固定的最佳螺钉植入。为了使螺钉固定失败最小化,应避免前上位置。本研究中测量的相对拔出力分布模式与先前关于肱骨头内小梁密度模式的观察性研究一致。