Pollard Jason D, Deyhim Ali, Rigby Ryan B, Dau Nathan, King Christy, Fallat Lawrence M, Bir Cynthia
Kaiser San Francisco Bay Area Foot and Ankle Residency Program, Department of Orthopaedics and Podiatry, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Oakland, CA, USA.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010 May-Jun;49(3):248-52. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
Displaced medial malleolus fractures are considered unstable and typically require open reduction and internal fixation for anatomic reduction and early joint range of motion. These fractures are usually fixated with either compression lag screws or tension band wiring depending on the fracture pattern, size of the distal fragment, and bone quality. When fracture fixation fails, it is typically in pullout strength. Failure of primary bone healing can result in nonunion, malunion, and need for revision surgery. The current study wished to explore a potentially stronger fixation technique in regard to pullout strength for medial malleolar fractures compared with traditional cancellous screws. This was a comparative study of the relative pullout strength of 2 fully threaded 3.5-mm bicortical screws versus 2 partially threaded 4.0-mm cancellous screws for the fixation of medial malleolar fractures. Ten fresh-frozen limbs from 5 cadavers, mean age 79 years (range of 65-97 years), were tested using the Instron 8500 Plus system. The median force recorded at 2 mm of distraction using unicortical partially threaded cancellous screws was 116.2 N (range 70.2 to 355.5N) compared with 327.6 N (range 117.5 to 804.3 N) in the fully threaded bicortical screw (P = .04). The unicortical screw fixation displayed only 64.53% of the median strength noted with the bicortical screw fixation at clinical failure. The current study demonstrated statistically significantly greater pullout strength for 3.5-mm bicortical screws when compared with 4.0-mm partially threaded cancellous screws used to fixate medial malleolar fractures in a cadaveric model.
移位的内踝骨折被认为是不稳定的,通常需要切开复位内固定以实现解剖复位和早期关节活动度。这些骨折通常根据骨折类型、远端骨折块大小和骨质情况,采用加压拉力螺钉或张力带钢丝固定。当骨折固定失败时,通常是拔出强度不足。一期骨愈合失败可导致骨不连、畸形愈合以及需要翻修手术。本研究希望探索一种在拔出强度方面可能比传统的松质骨螺钉更强的内踝骨折固定技术。这是一项比较研究,比较2枚全螺纹3.5毫米双皮质螺钉与2枚部分螺纹4.0毫米松质骨螺钉固定内踝骨折的相对拔出强度。使用Instron 8500 Plus系统对来自5具尸体的10条新鲜冷冻下肢进行测试,尸体平均年龄79岁(范围65 - 97岁)。使用单皮质部分螺纹松质骨螺钉在牵引2毫米时记录的中位力为116.2牛(范围70.2至355.5牛),而全螺纹双皮质螺钉为327.6牛(范围117.5至804.3牛)(P = 0.04)。在临床失败时,单皮质螺钉固定的中位强度仅为双皮质螺钉固定的64.53%。本研究表明,在尸体模型中,与用于固定内踝骨折的4.0毫米部分螺纹松质骨螺钉相比,3.5毫米双皮质螺钉的拔出强度在统计学上显著更高。