Neschis D G, Lexa F J, Davis J T, Carpenter J P
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, USA.
J Ultrasound Med. 2001 Mar;20(3):207-15. doi: 10.7863/jum.2001.20.3.207.
Recently the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial investigators reported a benefit of carotid endarterectomy compared with medical therapy for symptomatic patients with 50% or greater carotid stenosis. This has necessitated the development of screening parameters for diagnosis of 50% or greater carotid stenosis on the basis of the reference standards used in the study by the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. The duplex scans and arteriograms of 110 patients (210 carotid arteries) were reviewed by blinded readers. Duplex measurements of peak systolic velocity and end diastolic velocity were recorded, and the ratio of these velocities in the internal and common carotid arteries was calculated. The criteria determined for detection of 50% or greater stenosis were as follows: peak systolic velocity of the internal carotid artery greater than 170 cm/s (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 90%; positive predictive value, 92%; negative predictive value, 90%; and accuracy, 91 %); end diastolic velocity of the internal carotid artery greater than 60 cm/s (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 86%; positive predictive value, 95%; negative predictive value, 79%; and accuracy, 91 %); ratio of peak systolic velocity of the internal carotid artery to peak systolic velocity of the common carotid artery greater than 2 (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 75%; positive predictive value, 83%; negative predictive value, 89%; and accuracy, 85%); and ratio of end diastolic velocity of the internal carotid artery to end diastolic velocity of the common carotid artery greater than 2.4 (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 79%; positive predictive value, 88%; negative predictive value, 92%; and accuracy, 89%). It is concluded that 50% or greater carotid artery stenosis can be reliably determined by duplex criteria. The use of receiver operating characteristic curves allows the individualization of duplex criteria to the clinical situation.
最近,北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验的研究者报告称,对于有症状的、颈动脉狭窄达50%或更高的患者,颈动脉内膜切除术相比于药物治疗具有益处。这使得有必要根据北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验研究中使用的参考标准,制定用于诊断50%或更高颈动脉狭窄的筛查参数。110例患者(210条颈动脉)的双功扫描和动脉造影由不知情的阅片者进行回顾。记录双功测量的收缩期峰值流速和舒张末期流速,并计算颈内动脉和颈总动脉中这些流速的比值。确定的用于检测50%或更高狭窄的标准如下:颈内动脉收缩期峰值流速大于170 cm/s(敏感性92%;特异性90%;阳性预测值92%;阴性预测值90%;准确性91%);颈内动脉舒张末期流速大于60 cm/s(敏感性92%;特异性86%;阳性预测值95%;阴性预测值79%;准确性91%);颈内动脉收缩期峰值流速与颈总动脉收缩期峰值流速的比值大于2(敏感性93%;特异性75%;阳性预测值83%;阴性预测值89%;准确性85%);以及颈内动脉舒张末期流速与颈总动脉舒张末期流速的比值大于2.4(敏感性96%;特异性79%;阳性预测值88%;阴性预测值92%;准确性89%)。得出的结论是,通过双功标准可以可靠地确定50%或更高的颈动脉狭窄。使用受试者工作特征曲线可使双功标准根据临床情况个体化。