Gilpin C A, Carson N, Hunter A G
Eastern Ontario Regional Genetics Program, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.
Clin Genet. 2000 Oct;58(4):299-308. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580408.x.
The medical community and general population have become aware that genetic testing is available to look for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. However, criteria for who should be referred for genetic counseling and possible subsequent testing have yet to be determined, and many genetics centers have been overwhelmed by the demand for service. We set out to develop a family history assessment tool (FHAT) that could be used by physicians to select individuals for genetic counseling. Arbitrarily, we chose individuals who would have an approximate doubling of their lifetime risk for breast or ovarian cancer. The FHAT was then applied to 184 unrelated families, with an index patient who had breast or ovarian cancer and who had accepted the offer of BRCA1 BRCA2 testing. Data were compiled to compare the number of individuals who would have been referred for genetic counseling and the number of mutation-positive individuals who would have been screened out from counseling using FHAT, the tables from Claus, and the BRCAPRO system. In this population, FHAT was effective in minimizing both the number of referrals and the likelihood of missing women who were later found to be mutation-positive.
医学界和普通大众已经意识到可以通过基因检测来寻找BRCA1和BRCA2突变。然而,对于哪些人应该被转介接受遗传咨询以及后续可能的检测,其标准尚未确定,许多基因检测中心也因服务需求过大而不堪重负。我们着手开发一种家族史评估工具(FHAT),医生可以用它来选择接受遗传咨询的个体。我们随意选择了那些患乳腺癌或卵巢癌的终生风险大约会翻倍的个体。然后,FHAT被应用于184个无亲缘关系的家庭,这些家庭中有一名患有乳腺癌或卵巢癌的索引患者,且该患者已接受BRCA1/BRCA2检测。我们汇总数据,以比较那些本应被转介接受遗传咨询的个体数量,以及那些使用FHAT、克劳斯表格和BRCAPRO系统从咨询中被筛选出的突变阳性个体数量。在这一人群中,FHAT有效地减少了转介数量以及遗漏后来被发现为突变阳性女性的可能性。