• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Race/ethnicity and OMB Directive 15: implications for state public health practice.种族/民族与管理和预算办公室第15号指令:对州公共卫生实践的影响
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1714-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1714.
2
Measuring our nation's diversity: developing a common language for data on race/ethnicity.衡量我们国家的多样性:为种族/族裔数据制定通用语言。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1704-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1704.
3
Race/ethnicity and the 2000 census: implications for public health.种族/族裔与2000年人口普查:对公共卫生的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1709-13. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1709.
4
Methodological issues for vital rates and population estimates: 1997 OMB standards for data on race and ethnicity.生命率和人口估计的方法学问题:1997年美国管理与预算办公室关于种族和族裔数据的标准。
Vital Health Stat 4. 2001(31):1-30.
5
Setting the standards for collecting ethnicity data in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.为马萨诸塞州的族群数据收集制定标准。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):550-53. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318215a4c7.
6
Methodologic implications of allocating multiple-race data to single-race categories.将多种族数据分配到单一种族类别中的方法学意义。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;37(1):203-15.
7
Racial and ethnic identification practices in public health data systems in New England.新英格兰公共卫生数据系统中的种族和族裔识别做法。
Public Health Rep. 2002 Jan-Feb;117(1):50-61. doi: 10.1093/phr/117.1.50.
8
Race and ethnicity in public health surveillance: criteria for the scientific use of social categories.公共卫生监测中的种族与族裔:社会类别科学应用的标准
Public Health Rep. 1994 Jan-Feb;109(1):7-15.
9
Issues regarding data on race and ethnicity: the Census Bureau experience.关于种族和族裔数据的问题:美国人口普查局的经验
Public Health Rep. 1994 Jan-Feb;109(1):16-25.
10
Counting accountably: implications of the new approaches to classifying race/ethnicity in the 2000 census.进行可问责的计数:2000年人口普查中种族/族裔分类新方法的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1687-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1687.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Global Enrollment on Race, Ethnicity, and Age Representation in Pivotal Gynecologic Cancer Trials Leading to US Food and Drug Administration Drug Approvals.全球入组情况对关键妇科癌症试验中种族、族裔和年龄代表性的影响,这些试验导致了美国食品药品监督管理局的药物批准。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2025 May;11:e2400636. doi: 10.1200/GO-24-00636. Epub 2025 May 29.
2
The State of AfroLatinxs in Latinx Psychological Research: Findings From a Content Analysis From 2009 to 2020.拉丁裔心理学研究中的非裔拉丁裔状况:2009年至2020年内容分析的结果
J Lat Psychol. 2021 Feb;9(1):8-25. doi: 10.1037/lat0000187.
3
Disparities Research for Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Systematic Review and Critique of Literature.盆腔器官脱垂障碍的差异研究:文献的系统评价和批判。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Sep 1;30(9):758-764. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001469. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
4
Analyzing Patient-Provided Responses to Improve Collection of Health Equity Data Elements.分析患者提供的回复,以改进健康公平数据元素的收集。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:569-578. eCollection 2023.
5
The Cause of Death in Patients With Cancer.癌症患者的死因
JACC CardioOncol. 2023 Feb 21;5(1):67-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.01.004. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Barely Tweeting and Rarely About Racism: Assessing US State Health Department Twitter Use During the COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout.几乎不发推且很少涉及种族主义:评估美国州卫生部门在 COVID-19 疫苗接种推广期间的推特使用情况。
Ethn Dis. 2022 Jul 21;32(3):257-264. doi: 10.18865/ed.32.3.257. eCollection 2022 Summer.
7
Using COVID-19 Surveillance Systems to Identify and Monitor Disparities: Best Practices and Recommendations.利用新冠病毒监测系统识别和监测差异:最佳实践和建议。
Ethn Dis. 2022 Apr 21;32(2):151-164. doi: 10.18865/ed.32.2.151. eCollection 2022 Spring.
8
Health inequity drives disease biology to create disparities in prostate cancer outcomes.健康不平等导致疾病生物学产生前列腺癌结果的差异。
J Clin Invest. 2022 Feb 1;132(3). doi: 10.1172/JCI155031.
9
Consensus core clinical data elements for meningiomas (v2021.1).共识核心临床数据元素用于脑膜瘤(v2021.1)。
Neuro Oncol. 2022 May 4;24(5):683-693. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab259.
10
Strategies to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion in clinical trials.提高临床试验中多样性、公平性和包容性的策略。
Cancer. 2022 Jan 15;128(2):216-221. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33905. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Births and deaths: preliminary data for 1998.出生与死亡:1998年初步数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 1999 Oct 5;47(25):1-45.
2
The future of national public health surveillance in the United States.美国国家公共卫生监测的未来。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1996 Fall;2(4):1-3. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199623000-00003.
3
Ethnicity, maternal risk, and birth weight among Hispanics in Massachusetts, 1987-89.1987 - 1989年马萨诸塞州西班牙裔人群的种族、孕产妇风险与出生体重
Public Health Rep. 1993 May-Jun;108(3):363-71.
4
Maternal ethnicity and birthweight among blacks.黑人中的母亲种族与出生体重
Ethn Dis. 1993 Summer;3(3):255-69.
5
Future directions for comprehensive public health surveillance and health information systems in the United States.美国综合公共卫生监测与健康信息系统的未来发展方向。
Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Sep 1;140(5):383-97. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117261.
6
The 1989 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificates and Reports.《美国标准证书与报告》1989年修订版
Vital Health Stat 4. 1991 Jun(28):1-34.

种族/民族与管理和预算办公室第15号指令:对州公共卫生实践的影响

Race/ethnicity and OMB Directive 15: implications for state public health practice.

作者信息

Friedman D J, Cohen B B, Averbach A R, Norton J M

机构信息

Research and Evaluation, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston 02108, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1714-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1714.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.90.11.1714
PMID:11076237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1446393/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the impact of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB's) 1997 revised standards for the collection of race and ethnicity data on state health departments, using the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) as the primary example, and we make recommendations for states' implementation of these standards.

METHODS

After analyzing the revised OMB standards, existing MDPH data sets were assessed for the impact of the revised standards on data collection, tabulation, analysis, and reporting for state health departments.

RESULTS

The revised OMB standards will have an impact on the MDPH and other state health departments. Similarities and differences exist between federal and state health agencies regarding the purpose of data collection, tabulation, analysis, and reporting. These similarities and differences will affect state implementation of the revised OMB standards.

CONCLUSIONS

States need to plan for the implementation of the revised OMB standards and to understand the impact of this revision on the collecting and reporting of public health data. The revised OMB standards will introduce added complexities to the collection and analysis of race and ethnicity data, but they will also produce a more nuanced understanding of the relationship of race and ethnicity to the health of the American people.

摘要

目标

本研究以马萨诸塞州公共卫生部(MDPH)为主要实例,评估了管理和预算办公室(OMB)1997年修订的种族和族裔数据收集标准对各州卫生部门的影响,并就各州实施这些标准提出建议。

方法

在分析了OMB修订后的标准后,评估了MDPH现有数据集,以确定修订后的标准对各州卫生部门数据收集、制表、分析和报告的影响。

结果

OMB修订后的标准将对MDPH和其他各州卫生部门产生影响。联邦和州卫生机构在数据收集、制表、分析和报告目的方面存在异同。这些异同将影响各州对OMB修订后标准的实施。

结论

各州需要规划OMB修订后标准的实施,并了解这一修订对公共卫生数据收集和报告的影响。OMB修订后的标准将给种族和族裔数据的收集和分析带来更多复杂性,但也将使人们对种族和族裔与美国人民健康之间的关系有更细微的理解。