Durch J S, Madans J H
George Washington University, USA.
Vital Health Stat 4. 2001(31):1-30.
A workshop in July 2000 explored research needed to address methodological challenges for population estimates and vital rates arising from the revision of the standards for Federal data on race and ethnicity; the use of different standards for Census 2000 and vital records during the implementation of the revised standards; and underlying differences in the collection of race and ethnicity data in censuses and surveys and in vital records. Matching studies were proposed to compare race and ethnicity reports in vital records and in Census 2000 or survey responses. Work on vital records might include exploring enhanced collection of race and ethnicity data and documenting State vital statistics reporting mandates and practices. Key work on sources of error includes identifying, quantifying, and reporting on bias and random errors related to race and ethnicity in population estimates and vital rates. Also needed are comparisons of Census Bureau and State population estimates and more frequent tests of the accuracy of population estimates and projections. Studies on racial and ethnic identity were proposed to examine changes in reporting over time and to explore origins of racial and ethnic identities. More information on these issues should be developed for technical and nontechnical audiences.
2000年7月举办的一次研讨会探讨了以下几方面所需的研究:应对因联邦种族和族裔数据标准修订而产生的人口估计及人口动态率的方法挑战;在实施修订标准期间,2000年人口普查和人口动态记录采用不同标准的情况;以及人口普查、调查和人口动态记录中种族和族裔数据收集方面的潜在差异。有人提议开展匹配研究,以比较人口动态记录、2000年人口普查或调查答复中的种族和族裔报告。人口动态记录方面的工作可能包括探索加强种族和族裔数据的收集,并记录各州人口动态统计报告的要求和做法。误差来源的关键工作包括识别、量化并报告与人口估计和人口动态率中种族和族裔相关的偏差和随机误差。还需要比较人口普查局和各州的人口估计数,并更频繁地检验人口估计和预测的准确性。有人提议开展关于种族和族裔身份的研究,以考察报告随时间的变化情况,并探究种族和族裔身份的起源。应针对技术和非技术受众提供有关这些问题的更多信息。