Suppr超能文献

能否根据入院因素术前诊断出穿孔性阑尾炎?

Can perforated appendicitis Be diagnosed preoperatively based on admission factors?

作者信息

Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani V M, Lewis R J, Vargas H, Arnell T, Stamos M J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90509, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2000 Sep-Oct;4(5):470-4. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80088-8.

Abstract

The optimal initial treatment for selected patients with perforated appendicitis may be nonoperative. For this reason it is important to be able to diagnose perforated appendicitis preoperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of diagnosing perforated appendicitis using only admission factors. The study population was comprised of 366 adult patients who underwent appendectomy for presumed appendicitis during 1997. Admission factors associated with perforated appendicitis were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. These variables were then used to formulate a rule for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for this rule. The admission factors analyzed were sex, race, age, days of pain, temperature, heart rate, symptoms, physical examination findings, and laboratory findings. Multivariate regression analysis revealed days of pain, temperature, and localized tenderness outside the right lower quadrant to be significant (P <0.05). Using two or more days of pain, a temperature of >/=101 F (38.3 C), or localized tenderness outside the right lower quadrant as criteria to indicate perforation, we achieved a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 58% for distinguishing perforated from nonperforated appendicitis. We concluded that (1) perforated appendicitis cannot reliably be distinguished from nonperforated appendicitis based on admission factors, and (2) two or more days of pain, localized tenderness outside the right lower quadrant, and a temperature of >/=101 F (38.3 C) define a group of patients with appendicitis who have a high incidence of perforation.

摘要

对于某些穿孔性阑尾炎患者,最佳的初始治疗可能是非手术治疗。因此,术前能够诊断出穿孔性阑尾炎很重要。本研究的目的是确定仅使用入院时的因素来诊断穿孔性阑尾炎的准确性。研究人群包括1997年期间因疑似阑尾炎接受阑尾切除术的366例成年患者。使用单因素和多因素分析确定与穿孔性阑尾炎相关的入院因素。然后将这些变量用于制定穿孔性阑尾炎的诊断规则。计算该规则的敏感性和特异性。分析的入院因素包括性别、种族、年龄、疼痛天数、体温、心率、症状、体格检查结果和实验室检查结果。多因素回归分析显示疼痛天数、体温以及右下腹以外的局限性压痛具有显著性(P<0.05)。以疼痛两天或更长时间、体温≥101°F(38.3°C)或右下腹以外的局限性压痛作为提示穿孔的标准,我们区分穿孔性阑尾炎与非穿孔性阑尾炎的敏感性为86%,特异性为58%。我们得出结论:(1)基于入院因素无法可靠地区分穿孔性阑尾炎与非穿孔性阑尾炎;(2)疼痛两天或更长时间、右下腹以外的局限性压痛以及体温≥101°F(38.3°C)可确定一组穿孔发生率较高的阑尾炎患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验