Ivey F M, Roth S M, Ferrell R E, Tracy B L, Lemmer J T, Hurlbut D E, Martel G F, Siegel E L, Fozard J L, Jeffrey Metter E, Fleg J L, Hurley B F
Department of Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Performance, University of Maryland College Park 20742, USA.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Nov;55(11):M641-8. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.11.m641.
Because of the scarcity of data available from direct comparisons of age and gender groups using the same relative training stimulus, it is unknown whether older individuals can increase their muscle mass as much as young individuals and whether women can increase as much as men in response to strength training (ST). In addition, little is known about whether the hypertrophic response to ST is affected by myostatin genotype, a candidate gene for muscle hypertrophy.
Eleven young men (25 +/- 3 years, range 21-29 years), 11 young women (26 +/- 2 years, range 23-28 years), 12 older men (69 +/- 3 years, range 65-75 years), and 11 older women (68 +/- 2 years, range 65-73 years) had bilateral quadriceps muscle volume measurements performed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and after ST and detraining. Training consisted of knee extension exercises of the dominant leg three times per week for 9 weeks. The contralateral limb was left untrained throughout the ST program. Following the unilateral training period, the subjects underwent 31 weeks of detraining during which no regular exercise was performed. Myostatin genotype was determined in a subgroup of 32 subjects, of which five female subjects were carriers of a myostatin gene variant.
A significantly greater absolute increase in muscle volume was observed in men than in women (204 +/- 20 vs 101 +/- 13 cm3, p < .01), but there was no significant difference in muscle volume response to ST between young and older individuals. The gender effect remained after adjusting for baseline muscle volume. In addition, there was a significantly greater loss of absolute muscle volume after 31 weeks of detraining in men than in women (151 +/- 13 vs 88 +/- 7 cm3, p < .05), but no significant difference between young and older individuals. Myostatin genotype did not explain the hypertrophic response to ST when all 32 subjects were assessed. However, when only women were analyzed, those with the less common myostatin allele exhibited a 68% larger increase in muscle volume in response to ST (p = .056).
Aging does not affect the muscle mass response to either ST or detraining, whereas gender does, as men increased their muscle volume about twice as much in response to ST as did women and experienced larger losses in response to detraining than women. Young men were the only group that maintained muscle volume adaptation after 31 weeks of detraining. Although myostatin genotype may not explain the observed gender difference in the hypertrophic response to ST, a role for myostatin genotype may be indicated in this regard for women, but future studies are needed with larger subject numbers in each genotype group to confirm this observation.
由于缺乏使用相同相对训练刺激对年龄和性别组进行直接比较的数据,目前尚不清楚老年人是否能像年轻人一样增加肌肉量,以及女性在力量训练(ST)后增加的肌肉量是否能与男性一样多。此外,关于肌肉生长抑制素基因型(一种肌肉肥大的候选基因)是否会影响对ST的肥大反应,人们了解甚少。
11名年轻男性(25±3岁,范围21 - 29岁)、11名年轻女性(26±2岁,范围23 - 28岁)、12名老年男性(69±3岁,范围65 - 75岁)和11名老年女性(68±2岁,范围65 - 73岁)在ST和停训前后使用磁共振成像(MRI)对双侧股四头肌体积进行测量。训练包括每周对优势腿进行3次膝关节伸展运动,持续9周。在整个ST计划中,对侧肢体不进行训练。在单侧训练期后,受试者进行31周的停训,在此期间不进行常规运动。在32名受试者的亚组中确定了肌肉生长抑制素基因型,其中5名女性受试者是肌肉生长抑制素基因变异的携带者。
男性肌肉体积的绝对增加量显著大于女性(204±20 vs 101±13 cm³,p <.01),但年轻人和老年人对ST的肌肉体积反应没有显著差异。在调整基线肌肉体积后,性别效应仍然存在。此外,在31周的停训后,男性的绝对肌肉体积损失显著大于女性(151±13 vs 88±7 cm³,p <.05),但年轻人和老年人之间没有显著差异。当对所有32名受试者进行评估时,肌肉生长抑制素基因型并不能解释对ST的肥大反应。然而,当仅对女性进行分析时,携带较不常见肌肉生长抑制素等位基因的女性对ST的肌肉体积增加量比其他女性大68%(p = 0.056)。
衰老不会影响对ST或停训的肌肉量反应,而性别会产生影响,因为男性对ST的肌肉体积增加量约为女性的两倍,并且在停训后的损失比女性更大。年轻男性是唯一在31周停训后仍保持肌肉体积适应性的组。虽然肌肉生长抑制素基因型可能无法解释观察到的对ST的肥大反应中的性别差异,但在这方面肌肉生长抑制素基因型可能对女性有一定作用,但需要在每个基因型组中纳入更多受试者的未来研究来证实这一观察结果。