Thanigaraj S, Chugh R, Schechtman K B, Lee L V, Wade R L, Pérez J E
Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Jan 1;85(1):65-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00608-6.
Contrast echocardiography improves left ventricular (LV) endocardial border delineation by enhancement of the blood-tissue interface. In particular, the contrast appearing within the LV chamber exhibits characteristic flow patterns over the cardiac cycle, which may be related to the surrounding myocardial wall motion. To determine the relation between the LV intracavitary contrast flow pattern and surrounding wall motion, we reviewed the contrast-enhanced images of 348 consecutive patients studied at rest. We defined 2 different patterns of intracavitary contrast flow as visualized from apical views: a swift, vertical, and homogeneous flow towards the apex (pattern A), and a distinctly protracted, swirling, and heterogeneous flow (pattern B). Images recorded on videotapes were reviewed and the type of pattern (A or B) was determined within the initial 30 to 45 seconds of contrast appearance in the left ventricle. Contrast flow patterns interpreted by independent reviewer were then compared with the interpretation of the LV segmental and global function in each patient. Results demonstrate that 224 of 245 (91%) patients exhibiting pattern A had normal LV segmental function. Furthermore, all but 1 patient (102 of 103) with pattern B had > or =1 wall motion abnormality (p <0.0001). Contrast flow pattern B was observed irrespective of the location of LV wall motion abnormality. Global LV function was normal in 93% of patients exhibiting pattern A, whereas varying degrees of LV dysfunction were noted in 83% of patients with pattern B (p <0.0001). The presence of mitral regurgitation (p = 0.46), aortic insufficiency (p = 0.066), or mitral inflow Doppler abnormality (p = 0.102) was not significantly associated with either pattern. Thus, during contrast echocardiography, the LV intracavitary contrast flow pattern complements the assessment of global and segmental LV function.
对比增强超声心动图通过增强血液-组织界面来改善左心室(LV)心内膜边界的描绘。特别是,左心室内出现的对比剂在心动周期中呈现出特征性的流动模式,这可能与周围心肌壁的运动有关。为了确定左心室内对比剂流动模式与周围壁运动之间的关系,我们回顾了348例静息状态下接受检查的连续患者的对比增强图像。从心尖视图观察,我们将左心室内对比剂流动的2种不同模式定义为:一种快速、垂直且均匀地流向心尖的流动(模式A),以及一种明显延长、旋转且不均匀的流动(模式B)。回顾录像带上记录的图像,并在左心室对比剂出现后的最初30至45秒内确定模式类型(A或B)。然后将独立审阅者解读的对比剂流动模式与每位患者左心室节段和整体功能的解读进行比较。结果表明,245例呈现模式A的患者中有224例(91%)左心室节段功能正常。此外,除1例患者外(103例中的102例),所有呈现模式B的患者均有≥1处壁运动异常(p<0.0001)。无论左心室壁运动异常的位置如何,均观察到对比剂流动模式B。呈现模式A的患者中93%的左心室整体功能正常,而呈现模式B的患者中有83%出现不同程度的左心室功能障碍(p<0.0001)。二尖瓣反流(p = 0.46)、主动脉瓣关闭不全(p = 0.066)或二尖瓣流入多普勒异常(p = 0.102)的存在与这两种模式均无显著相关性。因此,在对比增强超声心动图检查期间,左心室内对比剂流动模式补充了对左心室整体和节段功能的评估。