• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The legislative tenets of client's right to treatment in the least restrictive environment and freedom from harm: implications for community providers.

作者信息

Marty D A, Chapin R

机构信息

OSPA, School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045-2510, USA.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2000 Dec;36(6):545-56. doi: 10.1023/a:1001952717471.

DOI:10.1023/a:1001952717471
PMID:11079183
Abstract

For over four decades, national legislation has supported efforts to move persons with severe and persistent mental illness out of restrictive hospital settings and into community based services. Within institutional walls, numerous duties of state have been established to help ensure humane and effective treatment. However, the legal protections afforded hospitalized residents have not appeared to follow these individuals into the community. This article analyzes relevant case law and attempts to establish similarities between the state hospital's duty to protect its residents and the responsibility of community mental health centers to do the same for the persons they serve. The authors argue that the client's right to freedom-from-harm must receive increased attention and community based service providers will have to enhance their capacity to deliver more effective risk management services if mental health reform is to become a successful social policy.

摘要

相似文献

1
The legislative tenets of client's right to treatment in the least restrictive environment and freedom from harm: implications for community providers.
Community Ment Health J. 2000 Dec;36(6):545-56. doi: 10.1023/a:1001952717471.
2
Law and the delivery of mental health services in the community.法律与社区心理健康服务的提供
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1994 Apr;64(2):194-208. doi: 10.1037/h0079526.
3
Developing an enforceable "right to treatment" theory for the chronically mentally disabled in the community.为社区中患有慢性精神疾病的残疾人制定一项可强制执行的“治疗权”理论。
Schizophr Bull. 1982;8(4):642-51. doi: 10.1093/schbul/8.4.642.
4
The Americans With Disabilities Act and community-based treatment law.《美国残疾人法案》与社区治疗法。
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Apr;50(4):473-4, 480. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.4.473.
5
Community treatment orders and Nova Scotia--the least restrictive alternative?社区治疗令与新斯科舍省——限制最少的选择?
Health Law J. 2003;11:1-33.
6
Managing severe mental illness in the community using the Mental Health Act 1983: a comparison of Supervised Discharge and Guardianship in England.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;36(10):508-15. doi: 10.1007/s001270170016.
7
The least restrictive alternative in the postinstitutional era.机构后时代限制最少的替代方案。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Oct;44(10):967-73. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.10.967.
8
Changes in residential arrangements of persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the decade following the Olmstead Decision of 1999.
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2011 Feb;49(1):53-4. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-49.1.53.
9
Deinstitutionalization: a public policy perspective.
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 1989 Jun;27(6):4-8. doi: 10.3928/0279-3695-19890601-04.
10
Risk, response, and mental health policy: learning from the experience of the United Kingdom.风险、应对措施与心理健康政策:借鉴英国的经验
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002 Oct;27(5):801-32. doi: 10.1215/03616878-27-5-801.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of maltreatment and diagnosis across levels of care in group homes.集体家庭中不同照护层级的虐待模式与诊断情况
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Apr;42:72-83. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
2
From beauty to despair: the rise and fall of the American State Mental Hospital.从美丽到绝望:美国州立精神病院的兴衰。
Psychiatr Q. 2009 Dec;80(4):219-31. doi: 10.1007/s11126-009-9109-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Community mental health treatment for the mentally ill -- when does less restrictive treatment become a right?为精神疾病患者提供的社区心理健康治疗——何时限制更少的治疗成为一项权利?
Tulane Law Rev. 1992 Jun;66(6):1971-2001.
2
Victimization of the mentally ill: an unintended consequence of deinstitutionalization.对精神病患者的伤害:非机构化治疗的意外后果。
Soc Work. 1987 Nov-Dec;32(6):502-5. doi: 10.1093/sw/32.6.502.
3
Johnson v. Solomon: a state's duty to develop community-based mental health treatment.约翰逊诉所罗门案:一个州发展基于社区的心理健康治疗的职责。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1987 Spring;3:281-308.
4
The first 18 months of mental health reform in Kansas.堪萨斯州心理健康改革的头18个月。
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Jun;46(6):580-5. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.6.580.
5
Deinstitutionalization: avoiding the disasters of the past.去机构化:避免重蹈覆辙。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1979 Sep;30(9):621-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.30.9.621.