Riskind J H, Williams N L, Gessner T L, Chrosniak L D, Cortina J M
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030-4444, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Nov;79(5):837-52. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.837.
The importance of cognitive styles as psychological antecedents of psychopathology has gained increasing acceptance over the past 2 decades. Although ample research has explored cognitive styles that confer vulnerability to depression, cognitive styles that confer vulnerability to anxiety have received considerably less attention. In the present investigation, we examined the looming maladaptive style (LMS) as a cognitive style that functions as a danger schema to produce specific vulnerability to anxiety, but not to depression. In 4 studies, we examined the psychometric properties of a revised measure of the LMS, its predictive utility, and its effects on threat-related schematic processing. Results provided evidence for the validity of the LMS and indicated that it predicts anxiety and schematic processing of threat over and above the effects of other cognitive appraisals of threat, even in individuals who are currently nonanxious.
在过去20年里,认知风格作为精神病理学的心理前因的重要性越来越被人们所接受。尽管有大量研究探讨了易导致抑郁的认知风格,但易导致焦虑的认知风格受到的关注要少得多。在本研究中,我们考察了迫近适应不良风格(LMS),这是一种作为危险图式发挥作用的认知风格,它会产生特定的焦虑易感性,但不会导致抑郁易感性。在4项研究中,我们考察了修订后的LMS测量方法的心理测量特性、其预测效用及其对与威胁相关的图式加工的影响。结果为LMS的有效性提供了证据,并表明即使在目前没有焦虑症状的个体中,它也能预测焦虑以及威胁的图式加工,其作用超过了其他威胁认知评估的影响。