Derby C A, Araujo A B, Johannes C B, Feldman H A, McKinlay J B
New England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA 02172, USA.
Int J Impot Res. 2000 Aug;12(4):197-204. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900542.
A concise, reliable means of assessing erectile dysfunction (ED) in large, multidisciplinary population-based studies is needed. A single, direct question for self-assessed ED was assessed in the population-based sample of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study (MMAS). Of the 1156 respondents to the 1995-97 MMAS follow-up evaluation, 505 were randomly selected to complete either the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) (n = 254), or the Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory (BMSFI) (n = 251), in addition to the single question self-assessment. The proportion not classified due to missing data was MMAS-9%, BMSFI-8%, and IIEF-18%. The single question correlated well with these other measures (r = 0.71-0.78, P < 0.001). Prevalence was similar to that based on the IIEF, agreement was moderate (kappa = 0.56-0.58), and associations with previously identified risk factors were similar for each classification. Thus, the MMAS single question may be a practical tool for population-based studies where detailed clinical measures of ED are impractical.
在大规模、多学科的基于人群的研究中,需要一种简洁、可靠的方法来评估勃起功能障碍(ED)。在马萨诸塞州男性衰老研究(MMAS)的基于人群的样本中,对一个用于自我评估ED的单一直接问题进行了评估。在1995 - 1997年MMAS随访评估的1156名受访者中,除了单一问题自我评估外,随机选择了505人完成国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)(n = 254)或简短男性性功能量表(BMSFI)(n = 251)。因数据缺失未分类的比例分别为MMAS - 9%、BMSFI - 8%和IIEF - 18%。该单一问题与其他这些测量方法相关性良好(r = 0.71 - 0.78,P < 0.001)。患病率与基于IIEF的患病率相似,一致性为中等(kappa = 0.56 - 0.58),并且每种分类与先前确定的风险因素的关联相似。因此,对于基于人群的研究而言,如果对ED进行详细的临床测量不切实际,MMAS单一问题可能是一种实用工具。