• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤学中医疗决策及医疗护理标准应用的分析

Analysis of medical-decision making and the use of standards of care in oncology.

作者信息

Holzer S, Fremgen A M, Hundahl S A, Dudeck J

机构信息

Institute of Medical Informatics, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:364-8.

PMID:11079906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2243722/
Abstract

Guidelines in medicine have been proposed as a way to assist physicians in the clinical decision-making process. Increasingly, they form the basis for assessing accountability in the delivery of healthcare services. However, experiences with their evaluation, as the most important step in the continuous guidelines process, are rare. Patient Care Evaluation Studies have been developed by the Commission on Cancer in the United States. As they reflect the "real-world" medical practice they are helpful in evaluating the quality of diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of tumor diseases in hospitals and cancer center and the compliance with current standards of care. In this context, they can provide an infrastructure for the analysis of the decision-making process.

摘要

医学指南被视为协助医生进行临床决策的一种方式。它们越来越多地成为评估医疗服务提供过程中问责制的基础。然而,作为持续更新指南过程中最重要的一步,对其进行评估的经验却很少见。美国癌症委员会开展了患者护理评估研究。由于这些研究反映了“现实世界”中的医疗实践,它们有助于评估医院和癌症中心肿瘤疾病的诊断、治疗及随访质量,以及对当前护理标准的遵循情况。在此背景下,它们可为分析决策过程提供一个框架。

相似文献

1
Analysis of medical-decision making and the use of standards of care in oncology.肿瘤学中医疗决策及医疗护理标准应用的分析
Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:364-8.
2
Evaluating the implications of clinical practice guidelines for patient care.评估临床实践指南对患者护理的影响。
Am J Med Qual. 2001 Jan-Feb;16(1):9-16. doi: 10.1177/106286060101600103.
3
[Evaluation of guidelines in oncology].[肿瘤学指南评估]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1999 Jan;93(1):15-22.
4
[Patient-oriented, treatment-accompanying documentation as a basis for evaluation with medical oncology as an example].[以患者为导向、伴随治疗的文档作为评估基础——以肿瘤内科为例]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Oct;94(9):759-64.
5
[Certification system in urological healthcare : a professional political evaluation].[泌尿外科医疗保健中的认证体系:专业政策评估]
Urologe A. 2014 Aug;53(8):1146-9. doi: 10.1007/s00120-014-3599-9.
6
Building Data Infrastructure to Evaluate and Improve Quality: The National Cancer Data Base and the Commission on Cancer's Quality Improvement Programs.构建用于评估和提高质量的数据基础设施:国家癌症数据库与癌症委员会的质量改进项目
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):209-12. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.003863. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
7
[Documentation in outpatient uro-oncology : contribution of the IQUO on quality assurance and healthcare research].[门诊泌尿肿瘤学中的文档记录:国际泌尿肿瘤学会对质量保证和医疗保健研究的贡献]
Urologe A. 2014 Aug;53(8):1156-7. doi: 10.1007/s00120-014-3546-9.
8
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
9
Balancing the Optimal and the Feasible: A Practical Guide for Setting Up Patient Registries for the Collection of Real-World Data for Health Care Decision Making Based on Dutch Experiences.平衡最优与可行:基于荷兰经验建立用于医疗保健决策的真实世界数据收集患者登记处的实用指南
Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):627-636. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
Continuing the conversation: questions on cancer care from the NCCN annual conference.继续对话:来自美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)年会的癌症护理问题
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012 May;10(5):567. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2012.0057.

引用本文的文献

1
An autonomous molecular computer for logical control of gene expression.用于基因表达逻辑控制的自主分子计算机。
Nature. 2004 May 27;429(6990):423-9. doi: 10.1038/nature02551. Epub 2004 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
[Primary psychosomatic management in general practice. Results of a German nationwide demonstration project of quality assurance].[全科医疗中的原发性身心疾病管理。一项德国全国性质量保证示范项目的结果]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Mar;94(2):127-31.
2
Integrated knowledge-based functions in a hospital cancer registry--specific requirements for routine applicability.医院癌症登记处基于知识的综合功能——常规适用性的具体要求。
Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:410-4.
3
Patient Care Evaluation Studies: applying this concept of quality management in oncology.患者护理评估研究:肿瘤学中质量管理概念的应用
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;43 Pt B:834-8.
4
Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness.基于计算机的指南实施系统:功能与有效性的系统评价
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Mar-Apr;6(2):104-14. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1999.0060104.
5
Development of guidelines for general practice care.制定全科医疗护理指南。
Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Apr;43(369):146-51.
6
The National Cancer Data Base. A mechanism for assessment of patient care.国家癌症数据库。一种评估患者护理的机制。
Cancer. 1994 Jan 15;73(2):499-504. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940115)73:2<499::aid-cncr2820730241>3.0.co;2-t.
7
Some problems in applying evidence in clinical practice.临床实践中应用证据的一些问题。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:210-24; discussion 224-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26350.x.
8
Long-term impact of initial surgical and medical therapy on papillary and follicular thyroid cancer.初始手术和药物治疗对乳头状和滤泡状甲状腺癌的长期影响。
Am J Med. 1994 Nov;97(5):418-28. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90321-2.
9
Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.临床指南对医疗实践的影响:严格评估的系统评价
Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317-22. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n.
10
A national quality improvement effort: cancer registry data.一项全国性质量改进工作:癌症登记数据。
J Surg Oncol. 1995 Mar;58(3):155-61. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930580304.