Suppr超能文献

通过双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验确诊芹菜过敏:对32例有芹菜根不良反应史受试者的临床研究

Celery allergy confirmed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge: a clinical study in 32 subjects with a history of adverse reactions to celery root.

作者信息

Ballmer-Weber B K, Vieths S, Lüttkopf D, Heuschmann P, Wüthrich B

机构信息

Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Aug;106(2):373-8. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.107196.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Celery root is a frequent cause of food allergy in pollen-sensitized patients. Because of problems in blinding challenges with fresh vegetables and the risk of anaphylactic reactions, no double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenges (DBPCFCs) with celery have been published so far.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to confirm the clinical relevance of celery as a food allergen by DBPCFCs and to evaluate current diagnostic procedures in patients with true allergy.

METHODS

DBPCFCs were performed in 32 patients with a history of an allergic reaction to celery. The patients underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) with celery extracts, crude celery, and different pollen extracts. Specific IgE for celery was determined by using the CAP method.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of 32 patients had a positive DBPCFC result. Two patients reacted to placebo, and 8 patients did not respond to the challenge. Of the nonresponders, 4 reacted to an open provocation with celery. The sensitivity of CAP determination for specific IgE (> or =0.7 kU/L) to celery in patients with a positive DBPCFC result was 73%, 48% to 86% for SPTs (> or =3 mm) with commercial extracts, and 96% for prick-to-prick tests with crude celery. The positive predictive value of the SPT and CAP tests was between 87% and 96%, whereas the specificity and negative predictive values were poor.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the importance of celery as a food allergen for use in DBPCFCs. The SPT and CAP methods proved to be reliable for the diagnosis of a relevant allergy to celery in regard to sensitivity and positive predictive value but not to specificity and negative predictive value.

摘要

背景

芹菜根是花粉致敏患者食物过敏的常见原因。由于新鲜蔬菜激发试验存在盲法实施困难以及过敏反应风险,目前尚无关于芹菜的双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验(DBPCFC)的报道。

目的

本研究旨在通过DBPCFC证实芹菜作为食物变应原的临床相关性,并评估真正过敏患者的现有诊断方法。

方法

对32例有芹菜过敏反应病史的患者进行DBPCFC。患者接受芹菜提取物、生芹菜及不同花粉提取物的皮肤点刺试验(SPT)。采用CAP方法测定芹菜特异性IgE。

结果

32例患者中22例DBPCFC结果为阳性。2例患者对安慰剂有反应,8例患者对激发试验无反应。在无反应者中,4例对生芹菜开放性激发试验有反应。DBPCFC结果阳性患者中,CAP法测定芹菜特异性IgE(≥0.7 kU/L)的敏感性为73%,商业提取物SPT(≥3 mm)的敏感性为48%至86%,生芹菜点刺试验的敏感性为96%。SPT和CAP试验的阳性预测值在87%至96%之间,而特异性和阴性预测值较差。

结论

本研究证实了芹菜作为食物变应原在DBPCFC中的重要性。就敏感性和阳性预测值而言,SPT和CAP方法被证明对诊断芹菜相关过敏可靠,但对特异性和阴性预测值不可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验