Asero R, Monsalve R, Barber D
Ambulatorio di Allergologia, Clinica San Carlo, Paderno Dugnano (MI), Italy.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 Jun;38(6):1033-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02980.x. Epub 2008 Apr 13.
Profilin, a pan-allergen present in all eukaryotic cells, is one of the main causes of cross-sensitization between pollen and plant-derived foods, but its clinical relevance as a food allergen is still debated.
To investigate the prevalence of profilin sensitization in a pollen-allergic population and its clinical relevance as a food allergen.
Two hundred consecutive patients with pollen allergy underwent skin prick tests (SPT) with purified natural date palm profilin (Pho d 2; 50 microg/mL; Alk Abello, Madrid, Spain). Those reporting adverse reactions to foods (confirmed by SPT with either commercial food extracts or fresh foods) underwent SPT with an apple extract containing uniquely Mal d 1 (2 microg/mL; ALK-Abello), and with a commercial peach extract containing uniquely lipid transfer protein (LTP 30 microg/mL; ALK-Abello).
Sixty patients (30%) showed skin reactivity to date palm profilin, Pho d 2. All were sensitized to grass pollen, and most of them reacted to birch, mugwort, ragweed and plantain pollen as well. SPT with pellitory and cypress scored negative in a high proportion of profilin reactors [26/60 (43%) and 33/60 (55%), respectively]. More than one half (34/60 [57%]) of profilin reactors had food allergy; 21 of these were monosensitized to profilin, 11 were sensitized to both profilin and Bet v 1 homologous protein, one to both profilin and LTP, and one to all the three allergens. The large majority of profilin-allergic patients reported oral allergy syndrome as the only food-induced symptom and were able to tolerate the offending foods if they were cooked or otherwise processed. Twenty-eight of 34 reported reactivity to two or more plant-derived foods. Rosaceae, tree nuts, melon and watermelon, tomato, pineapple, citrus fruits and banana were the more frequently offending foods.
Profilin should be considered a clinically relevant food allergen. Allergy to melon, watermelon, tomato, banana, pineapple and orange may be considered as a marker of profilin hypersensitivity. This study underlines the clinical importance of being able to diagnose hypersensitivity to single food allergenic proteins by SPT, particularly when the relevant food allergen sources contain several allergens that show different chemical/physical features and, hence, completely different risk profiles.
肌动蛋白结合蛋白是所有真核细胞中存在的一种泛过敏原,是花粉与植物源性食物之间交叉致敏的主要原因之一,但其作为食物过敏原的临床相关性仍存在争议。
调查花粉过敏人群中肌动蛋白结合蛋白致敏的患病率及其作为食物过敏原的临床相关性。
连续200例花粉过敏患者接受了用纯化的天然椰枣肌动蛋白结合蛋白(Pho d 2;50微克/毫升;西班牙马德里Alk Abello公司)进行的皮肤点刺试验(SPT)。那些报告对食物有不良反应的患者(通过用商业食物提取物或新鲜食物进行SPT确诊)接受了用仅含Mal d 1(2微克/毫升;ALK - Abello公司)的苹果提取物以及仅含脂质转移蛋白(LTP 30微克/毫升;ALK - Abello公司)的商业桃子提取物进行的SPT。
60例患者(30%)对椰枣肌动蛋白结合蛋白Pho d 2表现出皮肤反应性。所有患者均对禾本科花粉致敏,且大多数患者对桦树、艾蒿、豚草和车前草花粉也有反应。在大部分肌动蛋白结合蛋白反应阳性者中,用墙草和柏木进行的SPT结果为阴性[分别为26/60(43%)和33/60(55%)]。超过一半(34/60 [57%])的肌动蛋白结合蛋白反应阳性者有食物过敏;其中21例仅对肌动蛋白结合蛋白致敏,11例对肌动蛋白结合蛋白和Bet v 1同源蛋白均致敏,1例对肌动蛋白结合蛋白和LTP均致敏,1例对所有三种过敏原均致敏。绝大多数对肌动蛋白结合蛋白过敏的患者报告口腔过敏综合征是唯一的食物诱发症状,并且如果将引起过敏的食物烹饪或进行其他加工处理,他们能够耐受这些食物。34例患者中有28例报告对两种或更多种植物源性食物有反应。蔷薇科植物、坚果、甜瓜和西瓜、番茄、菠萝、柑橘类水果和香蕉是较常见的引起过敏的食物。
应将肌动蛋白结合蛋白视为一种具有临床相关性的食物过敏原。对甜瓜、西瓜、番茄、香蕉、菠萝和橙子的过敏可被视为肌动蛋白结合蛋白超敏反应的标志物。本研究强调了通过SPT诊断对单一食物过敏原蛋白超敏反应的临床重要性,特别是当相关食物过敏原来源包含几种具有不同化学/物理特性以及因此具有完全不同风险特征的过敏原时。