Alestig K, Lidin-Janson G
Scand J Infect Dis. 1975;7(4):265-71. doi: 10.3109/inf.1975.7.issue-4.08.
The effect on the aerobic faecal flora of a 10-day course of doxycycline or tetracycline hydrochloride was compared in 36 patients with acute infections mainly of respiratory origin. The patients were treated in hospital with a well-developed barrier nursing technique. The proportions of isolates of Escherichia coli resistant to tetracyclines were significantly lower after 10 days' treatment with doxycycline (80%) as well as one month later (24%), compared to the figures for tetracycline HCI (100% and 46%, respectively). The resistant strains selected during therapy probably represented the community flora. Only a small increase in multiresistant strains occurred and no identical strains were found in different patients. Thus, it seems possible to limit the biological side-effects of tetracyclines by a good barrier nursing technique. An increase in the number of E. coli resistant to tetracyclines cannot be avoided, but is more limited when doxycycline is used.
在36例主要由呼吸道感染引起的急性感染患者中,比较了为期10天的强力霉素或盐酸四环素疗程对需氧粪便菌群的影响。这些患者在医院采用完善的屏障护理技术进行治疗。与盐酸四环素治疗后的数字(分别为100%和46%)相比,用强力霉素治疗10天后以及1个月后,对四环素耐药的大肠杆菌分离株比例显著降低(分别为80%和24%)。治疗期间选择的耐药菌株可能代表了社区菌群。多重耐药菌株仅有少量增加,且在不同患者中未发现相同菌株。因此,通过良好的屏障护理技术似乎有可能限制四环素的生物学副作用。对四环素耐药的大肠杆菌数量增加无法避免,但使用强力霉素时增加更为有限。