Hole C D, Smit G H, Hammond J, Kumar A, Saxton J, Cochrane T
Division of Sport Studies, University College Northampton, UK.
Ergonomics. 2000 Oct;43(10):1603-9. doi: 10.1080/001401300750004023.
The hamstrings:quadriceps muscle strength ratio has been used as an indicator of normal balance between the knee flexors and extensors. A more functional approach to this strength ratio would be to compare opposite muscle actions of antagonistic muscle groups. The dynamic strength control ratio (DSCR) should give a more appropriate measure relating to knee function. There is a lack of normative data relating to DSCR for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient subjects. Effects of ACL deficiency on isokinetic peak torque for eccentric and concentric muscle actions of the quadriceps and hamstrings, in conjunction with isometric peak torque, were examined in 10 patients awaiting reconstructive surgery (male = 8, female = 2 ; age = 32.8 +/- 8.3 years; height = 1.77 +/- 0.08 m; mass = 72.1 +/- 12.5 kg). These variables were assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer. The results were considered in terms of the conventional ratio and DSCR. Anterior tibial drawer was measured using a knee ligament arthrometer to confirm clinical diagnosis of ACL rupture. The isokinetic peak torque data analysed were for angular velocities of 1.05 rad s(-1) (60 degrees s(-1)). Significant strength deficits were apparent between normal and injured sides for: concentric isokinetic quadriceps action (p < 0.05); isometric quadriceps action at 70 degrees of knee flexion (p < 0.05); isometric quadriceps action at 40 degrees of knee flexion (p<0.01); eccentric isokinetic hamstrings action (p < 0.05). With bilateral comparison, the conventional strength ratios showed no significant difference, as did the DSCR. The bilateral comparison of isometric strength ratios revealed significant losses in quadriceps strength for the injured side (p < 0.05) but no significant losses in hamstring strength (p > 0.05). Thus, differences can be seen in conventional ratios and DSCR for ACL-deficient subjects. This is an area of clinical interest with the increasing frequency of ACL reconstruction using hamstrings tendons.
腘绳肌与股四头肌肌力比一直被用作评估膝关节屈伸肌之间正常平衡的指标。对于这种肌力比,一种更具功能性的方法是比较拮抗肌群相反的肌肉动作。动态肌力控制比(DSCR)应该能提供一个与膝关节功能更相关的合适测量指标。目前缺乏前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤患者的DSCR规范数据。本研究对10名等待重建手术的患者(男性8名,女性2名;年龄 = 32.8 ± 8.3岁;身高 = 1.77 ± 0.08米;体重 = 72.1 ± 12.5千克)进行了检查,观察ACL损伤对股四头肌和腘绳肌离心和向心肌肉动作的等速峰值扭矩以及等长峰值扭矩的影响。使用等速测力计评估这些变量。结果根据传统比值和DSCR进行分析。使用膝关节韧带关节测量仪测量前抽屉试验,以确认ACL断裂的临床诊断。分析的等速峰值扭矩数据是针对1.05弧度/秒(60度/秒)的角速度。正常侧和损伤侧之间在以下方面存在明显的力量缺陷:股四头肌向心等速动作(p < 0.05);膝关节屈曲70度时股四头肌等长动作(p < 0.05);膝关节屈曲40度时股四头肌等长动作(p < 0.01);腘绳肌离心等速动作(p < 0.05)。双侧比较时,传统肌力比无显著差异,DSCR也是如此。等长肌力比的双侧比较显示,损伤侧股四头肌力量显著下降(p < 0.05),但腘绳肌力量无显著下降(p > 0.05)。因此,ACL损伤患者在传统比值和DSCR方面存在差异。随着使用腘绳肌腱进行ACL重建的频率增加,这是一个具有临床意义的领域。