Rowley J A, Aboussouan L S, Badr M S
Sleep Disorders Center at Hutzel Hospital, Department of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Sleep. 2000 Nov 1;23(7):929-38. doi: 10.1093/sleep/23.7.929.
To prospectively study the utility of four clinical prediction models for either predicting the presence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA, apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] > or = 10/hour), or prioritizing patients for a split-night protocol (AHI(3)20/hour).
All patients presenting for OSA evaluation completed a research questionnaire that included questions from previously developed clinical prediction models. The probability of sleep apnea for each patient for each model was calculated based upon the equation used in the model. Based upon two cutoffs of apnea-hypopnea index, 10 and 20, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were calculated. For the cutoffs AHI > or =10 and > or =20, receiver operating characteristic curves were generated and the areas under the curves calculated. Comparisons of demographic information and symptom response were compared between patients with and without OSA, and men vs. women.
Urban, accredited sleep disorders center.
All patients referred for evaluation of OSA who underwent polysomnography.
N/A.
370 patients (191 men, 179 women) completed the study. 248 of the 370 (67%) patients had an AHI(3)10; 180 of the 370 (49%) had an AHI> or =20. For AHI > or =10, the sensitivities ranged from 76 to 96%, specificities from 13%-54%, positive predictive values from 69%-77% using the probability cutoff of the original investigators; the areas under the curve from 0.669 to 0.736. For AHI(3)20, the areas under the ROC curves ranged from 0.700 to 0.757; using cutoffs to maximized specificity, the sensitivities ranged from 33%-39%, specificities from 87%-93%, and positive predictive values from 72%-85%. All the models performed better for men.
The clinical prediction models tested are not be sufficiently accurate to discriminate between patients with or without OSA but could be useful in prioritizing patients for split-night polysomnography.
前瞻性研究四种临床预测模型在预测阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA,呼吸暂停低通气指数[AHI]≥10次/小时)的存在或为采用分夜方案(AHI≥20次/小时)的患者进行优先级排序方面的效用。
所有前来接受OSA评估的患者均完成了一份研究问卷,其中包括先前开发的临床预测模型中的问题。根据模型中使用的公式计算每个患者每种模型的睡眠呼吸暂停概率。基于呼吸暂停低通气指数的两个临界值,即10和20,计算敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值。对于临界值AHI≥10和≥20,生成受试者工作特征曲线并计算曲线下面积。比较有和没有OSA的患者以及男性与女性之间的人口统计学信息和症状反应。
城市认可的睡眠障碍中心。
所有被转诊接受OSA评估并接受多导睡眠图检查的患者。
无。
370名患者(191名男性,179名女性)完成了研究。370名患者中有248名(67%)AHI≥10;370名患者中有180名(49%)AHI≥20。对于AHI≥10,使用原始研究者的概率临界值时,敏感性范围为76%至96%,特异性为13% - 54%,阳性预测值为69% - 77%;曲线下面积为0.669至0.736。对于AHI≥20,ROC曲线下面积范围为0.700至0.757;使用使特异性最大化的临界值时,敏感性范围为33% - 39%,特异性为87% - 93%,阳性预测值为72% - 85%。所有模型对男性的表现更好。
所测试的临床预测模型在区分有或没有OSA的患者方面不够准确,但在为分夜多导睡眠图检查的患者进行优先级排序方面可能有用。