Kinsky M P, Milner S M, Button B, Dubick M A, Kramer G C
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch and Shriners Burns Institute, Galveston, Texas 77555-0801, USA.
J Trauma. 2000 Nov;49(5):844-53. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200011000-00009.
Edema of tissue not directly injured by heat is a common complication after resuscitation of burn shock. Hypertonic 7.5% NaCl 6% dextran (HSD) infusion reduces early fluid requirements in burn shock, but the effects of HSD on peripheral and visceral tissue edema are not well-defined.
We measured the microcirculatory absorptive pressures of burned and nonburned skin and tissue water content of skin and other tissues in anesthetized sheep after 70% to 85% total body surface area scald and resuscitation. Fluid infusion was initiated 30 minutes after injury using 10 mL/kg HSD (n = 11) or lactated Ringer's (LR) (n = 12), with infusion rates titrated to restore and maintain preburn oxygen delivery (DO2). Thereafter, both groups received LR infusions as needed to maintain DO2 until the study's end at 8 hours. Colloid osmotic pressure was measured in plasma, and combined interstitial colloid osmotic and hydrostatic pressures were measured in skin.
Both treatments successfully restored DO2, but fluid requirements were less with the HSD group than with the LR group (43+/-19 mL/kg vs. 194+/-38 mL/kg, respectively, p < 0.05). The peripheral and visceral tissue water contents at 8 hours postinjury until the end of the study in both burn groups were significantly higher than in nonburn controls. However, HSD-treated sheep had significantly less water content in the colon (less 28%), liver (less 9%), pancreas (less 55%), skeletal muscle (less 21%), and nonburned skin (less 12%) compared with LR-treated sheep (p < 0.05 for each). HSD-treated sheep maintained significantly higher (3 to 5 mm Hg) plasma colloid osmotic pressure than LR-treated sheep.
There were no observed differences in edema in burn skin between the two treatment groups. The early volume-sparing effect of HSD and reduction in tissue edema are likely attributed to an increased extracellular osmolarity and a better maintenance of the plasma oncotic pressure.
热未直接损伤组织的水肿是烧伤休克复苏后常见的并发症。输注高渗7.5%氯化钠6%右旋糖酐(HSD)可减少烧伤休克早期的液体需求量,但HSD对周围和内脏组织水肿的影响尚不明确。
我们在70%至85%体表面积烫伤并复苏后的麻醉绵羊中,测量烧伤和未烧伤皮肤的微循环吸收压力以及皮肤和其他组织的组织含水量。伤后30分钟开始输液,使用10 mL/kg HSD(n = 11)或乳酸林格氏液(LR)(n = 12),输液速率进行滴定以恢复并维持伤前的氧输送(DO2)。此后,两组均根据需要输注LR以维持DO2,直至8小时研究结束。测量血浆中的胶体渗透压,并测量皮肤中的间质胶体渗透压和静水压之和。
两种治疗均成功恢复了DO2,但HSD组的液体需求量低于LR组(分别为43±19 mL/kg和194±38 mL/kg,p < 0.05)。两个烧伤组伤后8小时直至研究结束时的周围和内脏组织含水量均显著高于未烧伤对照。然而,与LR治疗的绵羊相比,HSD治疗的绵羊结肠(少28%)、肝脏(少9%)、胰腺(少55%)、骨骼肌(少21%)和未烧伤皮肤(少12%)的含水量显著更低(每项p < 0.05)。HSD治疗的绵羊维持的血浆胶体渗透压显著高于LR治疗的绵羊(高3至5 mmHg)。
两个治疗组之间烧伤皮肤的水肿未观察到差异。HSD的早期容量节省效应和组织水肿的减轻可能归因于细胞外渗透压升高和血浆胶体渗透压的更好维持。