Schalasta G, Eggers M, Schmid M, Enders G
Institute for Virology, Infectiology and Epidemiology and Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, Rosenbergstrasse 85, D-70193, Stuttgart, Germany.
J Clin Virol. 2000 Dec;19(3):175-85. doi: 10.1016/s1386-6532(00)00116-5.
Amplification techniques such as PCR are becoming increasingly popular in the field of diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) also, thus substituting conventional techniques like the time consuming HCMV antigen or cell culture assays. Current PCR protocols however, are labor intensive, and moreover, the need for extensive postamplification manipulations increases the risk of false positive results due to contamination with amplified products.
to overcome these shortcomings, the new ultrarapid and semi-automated real-time LightCycler PCR-system (LC-PCR), which combines amplification and detection in a closed capillary system, was tested for its suitability in diagnosis of HCMV in urines.
73 urine samples from 64 newborns and infants suspected of having congenitally or postnatally acquired HCMV were tested with the LC-PCR and results were compared with those obtained in parallel with a conventional PCR-ELISA and the rapid shell vial assay for detection of HCMV early antigen (EA-assay).
with these methods, 31 newborns/infants were found to be infected with HCMV. HCMV DNA was detected in 39 urines while the EA-assay was positive in 33 urines. All the EA positive samples were also positive for HCMV DNA. In the urines of the remaining 33 newborns (34 urine samples) neither HCMV DNA nor EA were detectable. The overall agreement of the two PCR tests was 100% while a 92% agreement was obtained between the PCR and the EA-assays. As the sensitivity of the three tests turned out to be quite similiar, the discrepancy observed in the positive rate between PCR and EA-assay is due to other factors which will be discussed in detail. However, while LC-PCR takes only about 2 h from sample preparation to result generation, the EA-assay, such as the conventional PCR-ELISA, needs 24-48 h. Furthermore, due to its capability to perform cycle-by-cycle monitoring, the LC instrument enables semi-quantitative analysis of HCMV viral-load.
LC-PCR is a suitable new tool for routine analysis of HCMV in the urines of newborns and infants. Compared to the conventional PCR-ELISA a considerable increase in test rapidity and reliability is achieved without the need to sacrifice sensitivity.
诸如PCR等扩增技术在人类巨细胞病毒(HCMV)诊断领域也越来越受欢迎,从而取代了耗时的HCMV抗原或细胞培养检测等传统技术。然而,目前的PCR方案劳动强度大,而且,由于扩增产物污染,大量的扩增后操作增加了假阳性结果的风险。
为克服这些缺点,对新型超快速半自动实时荧光定量PCR系统(LC-PCR)进行了测试,该系统在封闭的毛细管系统中结合了扩增和检测功能,以评估其在尿液中诊断HCMV的适用性。
对64例疑似先天性或后天性感染HCMV的新生儿和婴儿的73份尿液样本进行LC-PCR检测,并将结果与同时采用传统PCR-ELISA和快速空斑试验检测HCMV早期抗原(EA试验)所得结果进行比较。
通过这些方法,发现31例新生儿/婴儿感染了HCMV。在39份尿液中检测到HCMV DNA,而EA试验在33份尿液中呈阳性。所有EA阳性样本的HCMV DNA也呈阳性。在其余33例新生儿(34份尿液样本)的尿液中,未检测到HCMV DNA和EA。两种PCR检测的总体一致性为100%,而PCR与EA试验之间的一致性为92%。由于三种检测的灵敏度相当相似,PCR与EA试验阳性率之间的差异是由其他因素导致的,将在后面详细讨论。然而,LC-PCR从样本制备到得出结果仅需约2小时,而EA试验,如传统的PCR-ELISA,则需要24-48小时。此外,由于其能够逐循环监测,LC仪器能够对HCMV病毒载量进行半定量分析。
LC-PCR是新生儿和婴儿尿液中HCMV常规分析的合适新工具。与传统的PCR-ELISA相比,在不牺牲灵敏度的情况下,检测速度和可靠性有了显著提高。