Shore E R, Compton K L
Psychology Department, Wichita State University, KS 67260-0034, USA.
J Drug Educ. 2000;30(3):281-9. doi: 10.2190/V625-RHCW-P7J0-50MQ.
College students (n = 100) who had tried to stop someone from driving drunk, or who someone else had tried to stop, provided information about their interaction, including what was said and whether the intervention worked. Results suggest that the manner in which people intervene can affect the likelihood that the impaired person will not drive, with forceful statements, clear demands, and concrete action being more effective than requests, pleas, or suggestions. The hypothesis that intervention represents a threat to the person's image received limited support, possibly for methodological reasons. The concept of threat to competence is discussed, as are implications of the results for prevention and education activities.
100名曾试图阻止他人酒驾或曾被他人试图阻止酒驾的大学生提供了有关他们互动情况的信息，包括说了什么以及干预是否有效。结果表明，人们进行干预的方式会影响受损者不开车的可能性，有力的陈述、明确的要求和具体的行动比请求、恳求或建议更有效。干预对个人形象构成威胁这一假设得到的支持有限，可能是方法上的原因。文中讨论了对能力构成威胁的概念以及研究结果对预防和教育活动的启示。
