Hartkamp A, van Boxtel A J, Zonnenberg B A, Witteveen P O
Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre (UMC) Utrecht, F02.126 Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Neth J Med. 2000 Dec;57(6):215-23. doi: 10.1016/s0300-2977(00)00083-8.
Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) are valuable instruments in case prolonged intravenous therapy is required, but implantation and use of these devices are associated with complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate perioperative and long-term complications associated with TIVADs. In addition, we compared two different types of TIVADs with respect to implantation, care protocol and patients' comfort.
In a retrospective study perioperative and long-term complications in a general oncology population were analysed. In a prospective randomized study comparison of two types of TIVADs was carried out.
Perioperative complications occurred in 27 (21.4%) of 126 implanted TIVADs: catheter malposition (16.7%) in 21 patients, pneumothorax (0.8%) in one and haemorrhage (4.0%) in five. Long-term complications appeared in 31 (25.2%) out of 123 TIVADs: thrombosis in 9 (7.3%), especially associated with malposition of the tip of the catheter; infection in 10 (8.1%); extravasation in 2 (1.6%); migration of the catheter tip in 6 (4.8%); pain at reservoir in 3 (2.4%) and inaccessibility of the port in 1 (0.8%). No significant differences were found with respect to implantation, care accessibility and patients' comfort between the two TIVADs.
The use of TIVADs is associated with some risk of serious perioperative and long-term complications. In case of thrombotic complications these systems can be saved with appropriate treatment. Correct positioning of the catheter tip is essential to prevent thrombotic complications. In case of TIVAD-related infectious complications, the possibility of saving the TIVAD depends on the causative microorganism and type of infection. Furthermore, to increase patients' satisfaction with TIVADs they should be well informed about the surgical procedure and possible disadvantages of these devices.
全植入式静脉通路装置(TIVADs)是在需要长期静脉治疗时的重要器械,但这些装置的植入和使用会引发并发症。本研究的目的是评估与TIVADs相关的围手术期和长期并发症。此外,我们比较了两种不同类型的TIVADs在植入、护理方案和患者舒适度方面的差异。
在一项回顾性研究中,分析了普通肿瘤患者群体的围手术期和长期并发症。在一项前瞻性随机研究中,对两种类型的TIVADs进行了比较。
126例植入的TIVADs中有27例(21.4%)发生围手术期并发症:21例患者出现导管位置不当(16.7%),1例出现气胸(0.8%),5例出现出血(4.0%)。123例TIVADs中有31例(25.2%)出现长期并发症:9例(7.3%)发生血栓形成,尤其与导管尖端位置不当有关;10例(8.1%)发生感染;2例(1.6%)发生外渗;6例(4.8%)发生导管尖端移位;3例(2.4%)储液器部位疼痛,1例(0.8%)端口无法使用。两种TIVADs在植入、护理便利性和患者舒适度方面未发现显著差异。
TIVADs的使用存在一些严重围手术期和长期并发症的风险。对于血栓形成并发症,通过适当治疗这些系统可以挽救。导管尖端的正确定位对于预防血栓形成并发症至关重要。对于与TIVAD相关的感染并发症,挽救TIVAD的可能性取决于致病微生物和感染类型。此外,为了提高患者对TIVADs的满意度,应让他们充分了解手术过程以及这些装置可能存在的缺点。