Casi Casanellas A, Aizpuru Barandiarán F, Ibáñez Pérez F, Múgica Campos J, Torrabadella Luna S
Unidad de Atención Primaria La Habana, Vitoria-Gasteiz.
Aten Primaria. 2000 Sep 30;26(5):287-92. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(00)78666-5.
To find the effectiveness of clinical protocols in detecting and monitoring the most important cardiovascular risk factors: tobacco dependency, high blood pressure, hyperlipaemia and diabetes mellitus.
Cross-sectional descriptive study.
Primary care centres in the Basque Country.
1485 clinical histories of users aged between 40 and 75 who had attended for consultation over the previous two years, registered with general practitioners in the Basque Country who normally use clinical histories.
A questionnaire was sent to the people in charge of the 103 hierarchically organised centres requesting information on the use of protocols to detect and monitor the problems studied, and copies of protocols were requested. 77 centres (76%) replied and 66 sent 170 protocols. 990 clinical histories of doctors who used the four protocols and 495 of doctors who used none were analysed. These clinical histories belonged to lists of 45 doctors from 22 centres, chosen at random and stratified by whether their centre is registered with the PAPPS (preventive programme) or is a family and community medicine teaching centre. The centres using protocols were better at detecting tobacco dependency (24.6% vs 11.9%--p < 0.0005), hyperlipaemia (61.8% vs 53.1%--p < 0.001) and diabetes mellitus (75% vs 66.1%--p < 0.0005). The difference was less in the case of high blood pressure: 56.8% vs 52.1% (p = 0.097). No differences in quality in the monitoring of these problems were found.
The use of cardiovascular risk protocols by primary care centres is related to an improvement in the quality of cardiovascular risk detection, although not of its control.
探究临床方案在检测和监测最重要的心血管危险因素(烟草依赖、高血压、高脂血症和糖尿病)方面的有效性。
横断面描述性研究。
巴斯克地区的初级保健中心。
1485例年龄在40至75岁之间的使用者的临床病历,这些使用者在过去两年中前来就诊,在巴斯克地区的全科医生处登记,这些全科医生通常使用临床病历。
向103个分级组织的中心的负责人发送了一份问卷,询问有关使用方案检测和监测所研究问题的信息,并索要方案副本。77个中心(76%)回复,66个中心发送了170份方案。分析了使用这四种方案的医生的990份临床病历和未使用任何方案的医生的495份临床病历。这些临床病历来自22个中心的45名医生的名单,随机选择并根据其中心是否注册了PAPPS(预防计划)或是否为家庭和社区医学教学中心进行分层。使用方案的中心在检测烟草依赖(24.6%对11.9%,p<0.0005)、高脂血症(61.8%对53.1%,p<0.001)和糖尿病(75%对66.1%,p<0.0005)方面表现更好。高血压方面的差异较小:56.8%对52.1%(p=0.097)。在这些问题的监测质量方面未发现差异。
初级保健中心使用心血管风险方案与心血管风险检测质量的提高有关,尽管在风险控制方面并非如此。