Diekerhof C H, Barnaart L F, Rozing P M
Academic Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Acta Orthop Belg. 2000 Oct;66(4):376-81.
Seventy-six patients who had undergone revision of a cemented total hip replacement were reviewed with an average follow-up of almost ten years. The average age at primary total hip replacement (PTHR) was 63.3 years. The average time between primary total hip replacement and revision was 62.5 months. Revision surgery was performed without using special techniques such as acetabulum reconstruction or femoral bone grafting. We evaluated patients pre- and postoperatively using the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel(M d'A) hip score. Clinically we observed an improvement of the hip score after total hip revision, particularly regarding pain. Thirty hips required a second, and six a third revision. If re-revision is used as an end-point, our results are unsatisfactory, as we had a cumulative failure rate of 54% after 12 years. This is mainly due to not using special techniques adapted to revision situations.
对76例行骨水泥型全髋关节置换翻修术的患者进行了回顾性研究,平均随访时间近10年。初次全髋关节置换(PTHR)时的平均年龄为63.3岁。初次全髋关节置换与翻修之间的平均时间为62.5个月。翻修手术未采用髋臼重建或股骨植骨等特殊技术。我们使用Merle d'Aubigné-Postel(M d'A)髋关节评分对患者进行术前和术后评估。临床上,我们观察到全髋关节翻修术后髋关节评分有所改善,尤其是疼痛方面。30例髋关节需要进行第二次翻修,6例需要进行第三次翻修。如果将再次翻修作为终点指标,我们的结果并不理想,因为12年后我们的累积失败率为54%。这主要是由于未采用适合翻修情况的特殊技术。