Knoernschild K L, Campbell S D
Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois, Chicago, 60612-7212, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Nov;84(5):492-8. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.110262.
The purpose of this review was, first, to critically evaluate published evidence on the effects of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures (FPDs) on adjacent periodontal tissue health, and second to synthesize this evidence into meaningful summaries. Restoration qualities that contribute to inflammatory responses were identified based on strength of evidence, and variables that should be controlled in future investigations were outlined. Such information is necessary to accurately predict the prognosis of periodontal tissues adjacent to crowns or FPDs.
Clinical trial and epidemiologic evidence published in English was collected. The effects of crowns or FPDs on gingival inflammation, probing depths, and bone loss were evaluated based on accuracy of measurement, reliability of measurement, and/or appropriateness of data analysis.
Crowns and FPDs increased the incidence of advanced gingival inflammation adjacent to restorations, particularly if restorations had intracrevicular finish line placement, poor marginal adaptation, or rough surfaces. However, because of the limitation in the accuracy and reliability of probing depth measurements, reports of greater mean probing depths of crowned teeth, which tended to be less than 1 mm greater than control teeth, should be questioned. Finally, crowns and FPDs in general did not accelerate the rate of adjacent bone loss.
Clinically deficient restorations, as well as clinically acceptable restorations, can contribute to gingival inflammation. However, with the limitations of the applied methods of measurement, current evidence has not shown an increased attachment loss adjacent to crowns or FPDs. Future trials should document periodontal health before therapy and periodically after restoration insertion so that each tooth serves as its own control. In future studies, the periodontal disease history of the patient, the influence of the restoration on plaque formation, and the composition of the crevicular microflora must be recorded.
本综述的目的,首先是严格评估已发表的关于人工牙冠和固定局部义齿(FPD)对相邻牙周组织健康影响的证据,其次是将这些证据综合成有意义的总结。根据证据强度确定了导致炎症反应的修复质量,并概述了未来研究中应控制的变量。此类信息对于准确预测牙冠或FPD相邻牙周组织的预后是必要的。
收集以英文发表的临床试验和流行病学证据。基于测量的准确性、测量的可靠性和/或数据分析的适当性,评估牙冠或FPD对牙龈炎症、探诊深度和骨质流失的影响。
牙冠和FPD增加了修复体相邻部位重度牙龈炎症的发生率,特别是当修复体的龈下边缘位置不当、边缘适应性差或表面粗糙时。然而,由于探诊深度测量的准确性和可靠性存在局限性,关于戴冠牙齿平均探诊深度更大的报告(往往比对照牙齿大不到1毫米)值得怀疑。最后,一般来说,牙冠和FPD不会加速相邻部位的骨质流失。
临床存在缺陷的修复体以及临床可接受的修复体都可能导致牙龈炎症。然而,由于所应用测量方法的局限性,目前的证据并未显示牙冠或FPD相邻部位的附着丧失增加。未来的试验应记录治疗前的牙周健康状况以及修复体植入后的定期情况,以便每颗牙齿都作为自身的对照。在未来的研究中,必须记录患者的牙周疾病史、修复体对菌斑形成的影响以及龈沟微生物群的组成。