Pateman B
School of Nursing, University of Manchester, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2000 Mar;9(2):310-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00344.x.
This paper highlights issues related to men's health research arising from a small-scale study, carried out by a male researcher, to identify the experience of men following transuretheral resection of prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). The intention of this paper is to stimulate methodological debate rather than to be a research report. For the study, an informal interview approach was used within a phenomenological framework, and interview experiences raised issues which have been previously discussed under the rubric of feminist research. The conclusion drawn is that a style of research which attempts to gain a holistic view of patients' experiences is better termed 'humanistic research' because the term 'feminist research' clearly cannot be applied to men studying men's health-related experiences.
本文重点介绍了由一名男性研究人员开展的一项小规模研究中出现的与男性健康研究相关的问题，该研究旨在确定良性前列腺增生（BPH）患者经尿道前列腺切除术（TURP）后的经历。本文的目的是激发方法学辩论，而非成为一份研究报告。在该研究中，采用了现象学框架下的非正式访谈方法，访谈经历引发了此前在女性主义研究范畴下讨论过的问题。得出的结论是，一种试图全面了解患者经历的研究方式更适合称为“人文研究”，因为“女性主义研究”这一术语显然不能用于研究男性健康相关经历的男性。
