Hamilton A S, Mack T M
Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089-9175, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Dec 1;152(11):1093-103. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.11.1093.
A case-control study of breast cancer in twins diagnosed before 1988 was used to characterize the effects on odds ratios when proxy responses from co-twins are used. North American disease-discordant pairs were ascertained through advertisements, and mailed questionnaires were returned from both members of 671 pairs and from one member of 391 pairs. Biases from the proxy response were attributed to nonresponse or misclassification. Nonresponse varied according to type of exposure variable, depth of detail requested, joint exposure status of the pair, respondent's case-control status, zygosity, and social closeness of the pair. Misclassification was minimal, generally nondifferential, and a high degree of reliability between the proxy and self-report was indicated by the kappa statistic and the intraclass correlation coefficient. By using double-respondent pairs, a method was developed to adjust proxy responses for both sources of bias. These adjustments resulted in minor changes to the odds ratios for the variables studied (age at menarche, reproductive factors, and hormone use). A larger difference was observed between the odds ratios based on all pairs and those based on double-respondent pairs only. These findings demonstrate that, for these variables in this population, twins are reliable proxies for each other and that results from single-respondent pairs should be included.
