Antunes C M, Salgado A P, Rosário L M, Santos R M
Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Diabetes. 2000 Dec;49(12):2028-38. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2028.
Although isolated rat islets are widely used to study in vitro insulin secretion and the underlying metabolic and ionic processes, knowledge on the properties of glucose-induced electrical activity (GIEA), a key step in glucose-response coupling, has been gathered almost exclusively from microdissected mouse islets. Using a modified intracellular recording technique, we have now compared the patterns of GIEA in collagenase-isolated rat and mouse islets. Resting membrane potentials of rat and mouse beta-cells were approximately -50 and -60 mV, respectively. Both rat and mouse beta-cells displayed prompt membrane depolarizations in response to glucose. However, whereas the latter exhibited a bursting pattern consisting of alternating hyperpolarized and depolarized active phases, rat beta-cells fired action potentials from a nonoscillating membrane potential at all glucose concentrations (8.4-22.0 mmol/l). This was mirrored by changes in the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i), which was oscillatory in mouse and nonoscillatory in rat islets. Stimulated rat beta-cells were strongly hyperpolarized by diazoxide, an activator of ATP-dependent K+ channels. Glucose evoked dose-dependent depolarizations and [Ca2+]i increases in both rat (EC50 5.9-6.9 mmol/l) and mouse islets (EC50 8.3-9.5 mmol/l), although it did not affect the burst plateau potential in the latter case. We conclude that there are important differences between beta-cells from both species with respect to early steps in the stimulus-secretion coupling cascade based on the following findings: 1) mouse beta-cells have a larger resting K+ conductance in 2 mmol/l glucose, 2) rat beta-cells lack the compensatory mechanism responsible for generating membrane potential oscillations and holding the depolarized plateau potential in mouse beta-cells, and 3) the electrical and [Ca2+]i dose-response curves in rat beta-cells are shifted toward lower glucose concentrations. Exploring the molecular basis of these differences may clarify several a priori assumptions on the electrophysiological properties of rat beta-cells, which could foster the development of new working models of pancreatic beta-cell function.
尽管分离的大鼠胰岛被广泛用于研究体外胰岛素分泌以及潜在的代谢和离子过程,但关于葡萄糖诱导的电活动(GIEA)特性(葡萄糖反应偶联中的关键步骤)的知识几乎完全来自显微解剖的小鼠胰岛。使用改良的细胞内记录技术,我们现在比较了胶原酶分离的大鼠和小鼠胰岛中GIEA的模式。大鼠和小鼠β细胞的静息膜电位分别约为-50 mV和-60 mV。大鼠和小鼠的β细胞对葡萄糖均表现出快速的膜去极化。然而,后者表现出一种爆发模式,由交替的超极化和去极化活动期组成,而大鼠β细胞在所有葡萄糖浓度(8.4 - 22.0 mmol/L)下均从非振荡膜电位发放动作电位。这反映在细胞内Ca2+浓度([Ca2+]i)的变化上,在小鼠胰岛中[Ca2+]i是振荡的,而在大鼠胰岛中是非振荡的。刺激的大鼠β细胞被二氮嗪强烈超极化,二氮嗪是ATP依赖性钾通道的激活剂。葡萄糖在大鼠(EC50 5.9 - 6.9 mmol/L)和小鼠胰岛(EC50 8.3 - 9.5 mmol/L)中均引起剂量依赖性的去极化和[Ca2+]i增加,尽管在后者情况下它不影响爆发平台电位。基于以下发现,我们得出结论:两种物种的β细胞在刺激 - 分泌偶联级联的早期步骤方面存在重要差异:1)在2 mmol/L葡萄糖中,小鼠β细胞具有更大的静息钾电导;2)大鼠β细胞缺乏负责产生膜电位振荡并维持小鼠β细胞去极化平台电位的补偿机制;3)大鼠β细胞的电和[Ca2+]i剂量反应曲线向较低葡萄糖浓度偏移。探索这些差异的分子基础可能会阐明关于大鼠β细胞电生理特性的几个先验假设,这可能会促进胰腺β细胞功能新工作模型的发展。