Tanaka N, Tanaka N, Fujisawa T, Daimon T, Fujiwara K, Yamamoto M, Abe T
Kiyokai Tanaka-Kitanoda Hospital, Sakai-shi, Osaka, Japan.
Artif Organs. 2000 Dec;24(12):921-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06611.x.
Recently, the use of electrolyzed solutions has attracted considerable interest in Japan. This study investigates the efficiency of electrolyzed solutions as disinfecting agents (DA) in the reuse of dialyzers and compares their efficiency to that of other disinfectants currently in use. The following 3 methods were employed. First, the rinsing time and rebound release of reused dialyzers were measured and compared after electrolyzed solutions, electrolyzed strong acid aqueous solution (ESAAS) and electrolyzed strong basic aqueous solution (ESBAS), made from reverse osmosis (RO) water (ESAAS, ESBAS; Generating apparatuses: Super Oxseed alpha 1000, Amano Corporation, Yokohama, Japan), 2% Dialox-cj (Teijin Gambro Medical, Tokyo, Japan), and 3.8% formalin were used as DAs. This involved performing dialysis with 2 types of dialyzers: a cellulose acetate membrane (CAM) dialyzer and a polysulfone membrane (PSM) dialyzer. The dialyzers were cleaned and disinfected using the different DA and left for 48 h. Next, after performing dialysis the dialyzer membranes were cleaned with a saline solution (0.9% NaCl) and RO water and then cleaned with the various DA. These membranes were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to check for the presence of physical and biological contaminants. Finally, in vitro tests were performed to determine the level of dialyzer clearance when PSM dialyzers were reused after having been cleaned and disinfected with the electrolyzed solutions. The rinsing time results for both the CAM and PSM dialyzers showed the electrolyzed solutions (ESBAS and ESAAS) as being undetectable within 10 min. With regard to the rebound release, for both the CAM and PSM dialyzers, the electrolyzed solutions were undetectable at all checking times between 30 and 240 min. Observation by SEM showed that cleaning with both ESAAS and ESBAS left the fewest contaminants, and cleaning with 2% Dialox-cj left the highest level of contaminants in the CAM dialyzers. With regard to experiments concerning use in vitro, no major changes in the dialyzer clearance were noticed after 6 uses. In every experiment, the previous investigations showed the electrolyzed solutions to be superior to 3. 8% formalin and 2% Dialox-cj DA for the reuse of dialyzers.
最近,电解溶液的应用在日本引起了广泛关注。本研究调查了电解溶液作为透析器再利用消毒剂(DA)的效率,并将其与目前使用的其他消毒剂的效率进行比较。采用了以下3种方法。首先,在用反渗透(RO)水制成的电解溶液、电解强酸水溶液(ESAAS)和电解强碱水溶液(ESBAS)(ESAAS、ESBAS;生成装置:Super Oxseed alpha 1000,日本横滨天野公司)、2%的Dialox-cj(日本东京帝人 Gambro 医疗公司)和3.8%的福尔马林作为消毒剂后,测量并比较复用透析器的冲洗时间和反弹释放情况。这涉及使用两种类型的透析器进行透析:醋酸纤维素膜(CAM)透析器和聚砜膜(PSM)透析器。使用不同的消毒剂对透析器进行清洗和消毒,并放置48小时。接下来,在进行透析后,用盐溶液(0.9% NaCl)和RO水清洗透析器膜,然后用各种消毒剂进行清洗。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察这些膜,以检查是否存在物理和生物污染物。最后,进行体外测试,以确定用电解溶液清洗和消毒后复用PSM透析器时的透析器清除水平。CAM和PSM透析器的冲洗时间结果显示,电解溶液(ESBAS和ESAAS)在10分钟内检测不到。关于反弹释放,对于CAM和PSM透析器,在30至240分钟之间的所有检查时间都检测不到电解溶液。SEM观察表明,用ESAAS和ESBAS清洗后残留的污染物最少,而用2%的Dialox-cj清洗后,CAM透析器中的污染物水平最高。关于体外使用的实验,在6次使用后未发现透析器清除率有重大变化。在每项实验中,先前的研究表明,电解溶液在透析器再利用方面优于3.8%的福尔马林和2%的Dialox-cj消毒剂。