Differences in ocular surface irritation between timolol hemihydrate and timolol maleate.

PURPOSE

We evaluated the anterior segment surface reaction findings between timolol hemihydrate and timolol maleate. The only known difference between these preparations is the maleate salt.

METHODS

After a baseline examination, we randomized 28 healthy subjects (26 completed) to timolol hemihydrate or timolol maleate given in both eyes twice daily, in a double masked fashion, for 1 week. Subjects then were evaluated at the morning trough (hour 0 examination), dosed, and re-evaluated in 1 hour (hour 1 examination). Subjects were left untreated for 1 week and then switched to the opposite medication for the second study period.

RESULTS

Corneal staining (graded 0 to 4) for timolol maleate was worse between baseline (0.9) and hour 0 (1.4; P =.009) and baseline and hour 1 (1.4; P =.011). Also, mean punctate corneal staining for timolol maleate was increased from baseline (22.6) to hour 0 (31.7; P =.033) and showed borderline significance to hour 1 (33.4; P =.058), and for timolol hemihydrate there was a borderline significant elevation from baseline (24.2) to hour 1 (29.8; P =.060). When treatment groups were compared, there was a greater change in corneal staining with timolol maleate than timolol hemihydrate from baseline to hour 0 (P =.020) and greater staining with timolol maleate than timolol hemihydrate at hour 0 (P =.032). Nasal conjunctiva showed increased mean staining with timolol maleate from baseline (23.6, P =.035) to hour 0 (29.5, P =.035) and to hour 1 (31.9 P =.038) but not with timolol hemihydrate. There were increased symptoms of ocular dryness from baseline to hour 0 with timolol maleate (P =.012) but not with timolol hemihydrate.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that timolol maleate potentially may have more of an irritant effect than timolol hemihydrate on the corneal and nasal conjunctival epithelium.