Bauer A, Reischauer P, Kräusslich J, Schell N, Matz W, Goetz K
Institute of Optics and Quantum Electronics, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Max-Wien-Platz 1, D-07743 Jena, Germany.
Acta Crystallogr A. 2001 Jan;57(Pt 1):60-7. doi: 10.1107/s0108767300012915.
The atomic positions of the silicon carbide (SiC) polytypes 6H and 4H differ slightly from an ideal tetrahedron. These small deviations can be investigated by X-ray diffraction of so-called 'quasiforbidden' reflections, which are very sensitive with respect to the extremely small variations in the structure. Nevertheless, an unambiguous calculation of the refinement parameters from the absolute values of the structure factors of the 'quasiforbidden' reflections is not possible. In the case of SiC-4H, there are two and, in the case of SiC-6H, six different structure models, which yield the same absolute values of the structure factors. In order to distinguish between these models, additional phase information about the measured reflections is needed. To achieve this, Renninger-scan (psi-scan) profiles in the vicinity of three-beam cases are used. These experimentally measured psi-scans are compared with theoretical calculated profiles for each model. Another method to distinguish the different models is to compare the bond lengths between atoms of the two polytypes, which have equivalent vicinities. For both SiC-4H and SiC-6H, an unambiguous determination of the structure refinement parameters was possible.
碳化硅(SiC)多型体6H和4H的原子位置与理想四面体略有不同。这些小偏差可以通过所谓“准禁阻”反射的X射线衍射来研究,这些反射对结构中极其微小的变化非常敏感。然而,根据“准禁阻”反射的结构因子绝对值对精修参数进行明确计算是不可能的。对于SiC - 4H,有两种不同的结构模型,对于SiC - 6H,则有六种不同的结构模型,它们产生相同的结构因子绝对值。为了区分这些模型,需要有关测量反射的额外相位信息。为此,使用了三光束情况下附近的伦宁格扫描(ψ扫描)剖面图。将这些实验测量的ψ扫描与每个模型的理论计算剖面图进行比较。另一种区分不同模型的方法是比较两种多型体中具有等效邻域的原子之间的键长。对于SiC - 4H和SiC - 6H,都有可能明确确定结构精修参数。