• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠间隔作为胎盘植入的一个风险因素。

Interpregnancy interval as a risk factor for placenta accreta.

作者信息

Wax J R, Seiler A, Horowitz S, Ingardia C J

机构信息

University of Connecticut School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Conn Med. 2000 Nov;64(11):659-61.

PMID:11125633
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the interval from a previous delivery or cesarean to the next conception differs between patients with abnormally adherent placentas as compared to those with normally implanted placentas.

METHODS

We identified all histologically confirmed placentas--accreta, increta, and percreta--at our hospital from 1992-1999. Subjects were excluded for primigravidity in the affected pregnancy or inability to identify matched controls. Cases were matched to the next three consecutive women delivering for maternal age (> or = 35 years or < 35 years), placenta previa (yes or no), prior cesarean (yes or no), prior uterine curettage (yes or no), and prior vaginal delivery (yes or no). The primary outcomes were delivery-to-conception and cesarean-to-conception intervals. Secondary outcomes included measures of maternal and neonatal morbidity.

RESULTS

Delivery-to-conception intervals for cases and controls were 37.1 +/- 18.7 months and 37.9 +/- 22.7 months, respectively (P = .91). Cesarean-to-conception intervals for cases and controls were 35.2 +/- 18.2 and 48.1 +/- 31.0 months, respectively (P = .35). Cases were more likely to require uterine curettage (54.5 vs 0%), hysterectomy (81.8 vs 0%), and transfusion (72.7 vs 0%), all P < .001. Subjects with accreta delivered earlier (31.7 +/- 9.4 vs 38.1 +/- 2.6 weeks, P = .054) and smaller infants (2,158 +/- 1,180 g vs 3,159 +/- 781 g, P = .006) who were more likely to have five-minute Apgar scores < 7 (18.2% vs 0%, P = .038).

CONCLUSIONS

Cesarean-to-conception intervals but not delivery-to-conception intervals are shorter in patients with abnormally adherent placentas. Placenta accreta is associated with significant maternal and perinatal morbidity.

摘要

目的

确定与胎盘正常植入的患者相比,胎盘异常粘连的患者从上一次分娩或剖宫产到下一次受孕的间隔时间是否存在差异。

方法

我们识别了1992年至1999年我院所有经组织学确诊的胎盘——植入性胎盘、穿透性胎盘和侵入性胎盘。受影响妊娠为初孕或无法识别匹配对照的受试者被排除。病例与接下来连续三位因产妇年龄(≥35岁或<35岁)、前置胎盘(是或否)、既往剖宫产史(是或否)、既往刮宫史(是或否)和既往阴道分娩史(是或否)而分娩的女性进行匹配。主要结局为分娩至受孕间隔时间和剖宫产至受孕间隔时间。次要结局包括孕产妇和新生儿发病率的指标。

结果

病例组和对照组的分娩至受孕间隔时间分别为37.1±18.7个月和37.9±22.7个月(P = 0.91)。病例组和对照组的剖宫产至受孕间隔时间分别为35.2±18.2个月和48.1±31.0个月(P = 0.35)。病例组更有可能需要刮宫(54.5%对0%)、子宫切除术(81.8%对0%)和输血(72.7%对0%),所有P均<0.001。植入性胎盘的受试者分娩时间更早(31.7±9.4周对38.1±2.6周,P = 0.054),婴儿体重更小(2158±1180克对3159±781克,P = 0.006),且5分钟阿氏评分<7分的可能性更大(18.2%对0%,P = 0.038)。

结论

胎盘异常粘连的患者剖宫产至受孕间隔时间较短,但分娩至受孕间隔时间无差异。植入性胎盘与严重的孕产妇和围产期发病率相关。

相似文献

1
Interpregnancy interval as a risk factor for placenta accreta.妊娠间隔作为胎盘植入的一个风险因素。
Conn Med. 2000 Nov;64(11):659-61.
2
Twin vaginal birth after cesarean.剖宫产术后经阴道双胎分娩
Conn Med. 2000 Apr;64(4):205-8.
3
Obstetric risk factors associated with placenta previa development: case-control study.与前置胎盘发生相关的产科危险因素:病例对照研究。
Croat Med J. 2003 Dec;44(6):728-33.
4
Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis.胎盘植入异常:二十年分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1458-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.074.
5
Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.短生育间隔:剖宫产术后子宫破裂风险及经阴道分娩并发症
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1075-82. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000286759.49895.46.
6
Placenta previa-accreta: risk factors and complications.前置胎盘植入:危险因素及并发症
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 2):1045-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.037.
7
Placenta accreta: risk factors, perinatal outcomes, and consequences for subsequent births.胎盘植入:危险因素、围产期结局以及对后续分娩的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):219.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.037. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
8
Risk factors and morbidity in patients with placenta previa accreta compared to placenta previa non-accreta.与非植入性前置胎盘相比,植入性前置胎盘患者的危险因素及发病率
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Apr;77(4):391-4.
9
Placenta accreta is associated with elevated maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein.
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;82(2):266-9.
10
Placenta accreta--summary of 10 years: a survey of 310 cases.胎盘植入——10年总结:310例病例调查
Placenta. 2002 Feb-Mar;23(2-3):210-4. doi: 10.1053/plac.2001.0764.

引用本文的文献

1
Placenta accreta outcomes and risk factors in a referral hospital in north of Iran: A case control study.伊朗北部一家转诊医院的胎盘植入结局及危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 10;7(4):e2006. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2006. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse maternal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review.高资源环境下的短孕期间隔与不良孕产妇结局:一项更新的系统评价。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;33(1):O48-O59. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12518. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
3
Interpregnancy interval and abnormally invasive placentation.
妊娠间隔与异常侵袭性胎盘。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Feb;98(2):183-187. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13478. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
Placenta accreta following hysteroscopic myomectomy.宫腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术后胎盘植入
Clin Case Rep. 2016 Apr 20;4(6):541-4. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.562. eCollection 2016 Jun.
5
Maternal serum markers, characteristics and morbidly adherent placenta in women with previa.前置胎盘孕妇的血清标志物、特征与胎盘粘连
J Perinatol. 2015 Aug;35(8):570-4. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.40. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
6
The importance of a late first trimester placental sonogram in patients at risk of abnormal placentation.孕早期晚期胎盘超声检查对胎盘植入异常风险患者的重要性。
Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2014;2014:345348. doi: 10.1155/2014/345348. Epub 2014 Jun 1.