Murphy G L, Kaplan A S
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, 603 East Daniel St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 Nov;53(4):962-82. doi: 10.1080/713755932.
Three experiments examined the interactions of category structure and prior knowledge in category learning. Experiment 1 examined the distribution of atypical or "crossover" features in category learning. In real categories, crossover features may be unevenly distributed--found primarily in very unusual examples of a category (like whales or ostriches). In contrast, in many psychology experiments, each item has exactly one crossover feature. Even versus uneven distribution of crossover features did not affect category learning when the features were neutral. However, when the features were connected by prior knowledge, it was much harder for subjects to learn the structure with the uneven distribution of crossover features. Experiments 2 and 3 found similar results with a slightly less uneven condition. We conclude that learning is a function of the interaction of category structure and prior knowledge rather than either one alone. Furthermore, knowledge benefits learning even when the category contains contradictions of the knowledge, so long as the contradictions are not very salient.
三项实验研究了类别学习中类别结构与先验知识的相互作用。实验1考察了类别学习中非典型或“交叉”特征的分布情况。在实际类别中,交叉特征可能分布不均——主要出现在某个类别的非常特殊的例子中(如鲸鱼或鸵鸟)。相比之下,在许多心理学实验中,每个项目都恰好有一个交叉特征。当特征为中性时,交叉特征的均匀分布与不均匀分布并不影响类别学习。然而,当这些特征通过先验知识联系起来时,受试者学习具有不均匀分布交叉特征的结构就困难得多。实验2和实验3在不均匀程度稍低的情况下也发现了类似结果。我们得出结论,学习是类别结构与先验知识相互作用的结果,而非仅取决于其中之一。此外,即使类别包含与知识相矛盾的内容,只要这些矛盾不太明显,知识就能促进学习。