• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先验知识与线索回忆:类别大小与主导性

Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.

作者信息

Nelson D L, Bajo M T

出版信息

Am J Psychol. 1985 Winter;98(4):503-17.

PMID:4096333
Abstract

Previous work indicates that our ability to recall a recently experienced word is reduced by the number of related concepts that it activates in permanent memory. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the possibility that dominance of primary associates, and not category size, is responsible for this observation. The results of three experiments involving manipulations of target and cue set size, as well as meaning and rhyme, indicate that category size effects are independent of dominance. In fact, the advantage of smaller categories and fewer activated items is substantially reduced for words having very dominant primary associates. The findings are discussed in relation to the Sensory-Semantic model.

摘要

先前的研究表明,我们回忆最近经历过的单词的能力会因该单词在长期记忆中激活的相关概念数量而降低。本研究的目的是评估主要联想的主导性而非类别大小是导致这一现象的原因的可能性。三项涉及操纵目标和线索集大小以及意义和押韵的实验结果表明,类别大小效应与主导性无关。事实上,对于具有非常主导性主要联想的单词,较小类别和较少激活项目的优势会大幅降低。研究结果结合感觉 - 语义模型进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.先验知识与线索回忆:类别大小与主导性
Am J Psychol. 1985 Winter;98(4):503-17.
2
Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.线索回忆、片段完成、知觉识别和再认中的词汇与语义搜索。
Am J Psychol. 1988 Winter;101(4):465-80.
3
Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.基于图像和句子记忆的线索回忆:从情景记忆到相同元素表征的转变。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):734-48. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.734.
4
Encoding and cuing sounds and senses.对声音和感觉进行编码及提示。
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Nov;6(6):717-31.
5
Prior knowledge and recognition.
Am J Psychol. 1985 Fall;98(3):379-97.
6
The role of inhibitory processes in part-list cuing.抑制过程在部分线索提示中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):335-41. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.335.
7
Age of acquisition's effect on memory for semantically associated word pairs.习得年龄对语义相关词对记忆的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Aug;61(8):1177-85. doi: 10.1080/17470210802013391.
8
Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.有意遗忘能减少错误记忆吗?列表层面和项目层面遗忘的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jan;127(1):146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.03.004. Epub 2007 May 1.
9
Semantic and contextual cuing of preschool children's recall.学龄前儿童回忆的语义和情境线索
Child Dev. 1981 Sep;52(3):873-81.
10
The emergent generation effect and hypermnesia: influences of semantic and nonsemantic generation tasks.即时生成效应与记忆增强:语义和非语义生成任务的影响
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):541-54.

引用本文的文献

1
What is free association and what does it measure?什么是自由联想,它衡量的是什么?
Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):887-99. doi: 10.3758/bf03209337.
2
Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses.目标集大小对知晓感和线索回忆的影响:对线索有效性和部分检索假设的启示
Mem Cognit. 1998 May;26(3):553-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03201162.
3
The effects of natural category size on memory for episodic encodings.
Mem Cognit. 1987 Mar;15(2):133-40. doi: 10.3758/bf03197024.