Robbins M S, Alexander J F, Turner C W
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Florida, USA.
J Fam Psychol. 2000 Dec;14(4):688-701. doi: 10.1037//0893-3200.14.4.688.
This study compared the immediate impact of therapist reframing, reflection, and elicit-structure interventions on family-member defensive communications in the initial session of family therapy with a delinquent adolescent. Defensive statements included family-member statements that criticized, blamed, or disagreed with other family members. Sequences of behaviors following defensive family-member statements were examined to determine which therapist interventions were the most effective in disrupting defensive family interactions. Thus, every sequence included a defensive family-member behavior, a therapist intervention, and a family-member response (sequence: family defensive-->therapist intervention-->family response). Results indicated that therapist reframing is more effective than other therapist interventions in reducing family-members' defensive statements. Moreover, adolescents responded more favorably to reframes than did fathers.
本研究比较了在对一名青少年犯罪者进行家庭治疗的首次治疗中,治疗师重新构建、反思和引出结构干预对家庭成员防御性沟通的即时影响。防御性陈述包括家庭成员批评、指责或不同意其他家庭成员的陈述。研究了防御性家庭成员陈述之后的行为序列,以确定哪种治疗师干预在破坏防御性家庭互动方面最有效。因此,每个序列都包括一个防御性家庭成员行为、一次治疗师干预和一次家庭成员反应(序列:家庭防御→治疗师干预→家庭反应)。结果表明,在减少家庭成员的防御性陈述方面,治疗师重新构建比其他治疗师干预更有效。此外,青少年对重新构建的反应比对父亲的反应更积极。