Vazquez-Palacios G, Velazquez-Moctezuma J
Department of Reproductive Biology, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, C.P. 09340, DF, Mexico City, Mexico.
Physiol Behav. 2000;71(1-2):23-8. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(00)00285-7.
Knowledge concerning the impact of stressful situations on the sleep-wake pattern has been growing rapidly in the last decade. Immobilization (IMB) in rats elicits a significant increase of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep during the following 10 h. Participation of the adrenergic system has been clearly shown in this effect. On the other hand, it is well known that the time of the circadian cycle in which the stressor is applied could influence the results. It is also well known that the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, the release of corticosterone (COR), and the activation of the adrenergic and of the opioidergic systems are the most evident effects of stress. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of two stressors, IMB and electric foot shocks (EFS), on 24 h of continuous sleep recordings. These stressors were applied immediately before the onset of the light period. COR was also administered in an attempt to replicate the stressor-induced effects. Adult, male Wistar rats were chronically implanted for sleep recording, and after a recovery period and a 24-h basal sleep recording, they were submitted to EFS, COR, and IMB. A 10-day period elapsed between each treatment, and all of them were applied during the last moments of the dark phase of the light cycle. Results showed that IMB increased the percentage of REM sleep (83.7%) and slow-wave sleep II (SWS II; 17.3%) mainly during the dark phase (i.e., after 12 h), while EFS and COR administration elicited only slight and transient changes in the sleep-wake pattern. These data suggest that IMB applied to rats at the end of the dark cycle is effective in producing a sleep-elevating response, although this effect is enhanced during the dark phase. It seems, however, that not all the stressful situations are capable of eliciting this sleep-promoting effect, and also that COR release does not mediate this response.
在过去十年中,关于应激情况对睡眠-觉醒模式影响的知识增长迅速。大鼠制动(IMB)会导致在随后10小时内快速眼动(REM)睡眠显著增加。已明确显示肾上腺素能系统参与了这一效应。另一方面,众所周知,施加应激源的昼夜周期时间可能会影响结果。同样众所周知的是,下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴的激活、皮质酮(COR)的释放以及肾上腺素能和阿片样物质能系统的激活是应激最明显的效应。在本研究中,我们分析了两种应激源,即IMB和电足部电击(EFS),对24小时连续睡眠记录的影响。这些应激源在光照期开始前立即施加。还给予了COR以试图复制应激源诱导的效应。成年雄性Wistar大鼠被长期植入用于睡眠记录,在恢复期和24小时基础睡眠记录后,它们接受了EFS、COR和IMB处理。每次处理之间间隔10天,所有处理均在光周期暗相的最后时刻进行。结果表明,IMB主要在暗相(即12小时后)增加了REM睡眠百分比(83.7%)和慢波睡眠II(SWS II;17.3%),而EFS和COR给药仅引起睡眠-觉醒模式的轻微和短暂变化。这些数据表明,在暗周期结束时对大鼠施加IMB可有效产生睡眠增强反应,尽管这种效应在暗相期间会增强。然而,似乎并非所有应激情况都能引发这种促睡眠效应,而且COR释放也不介导这种反应。