Oonk Marcella, Krueger James M, Davis Christopher J
Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA.
Sleep and Performance Research Center, Washington State University, Spokane, WA.
Sleep. 2016 Jul 1;39(7):1467-79. doi: 10.5665/sleep.5984.
Animal sleep deprivation (SDEP), in contrast to human SDEP, is involuntary and involves repeated exposure to aversive stimuli including the inability of the animal to control the waking stimulus. Therefore, we explored intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS), an operant behavior, as a method for voluntary SDEP in rodents.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with electroencephalography/electromyography (EEG/EMG) recording electrodes and a unilateral bipolar electrode into the lateral hypothalamus. Rats were allowed to self-stimulate, or underwent gentle handling-induced SDEP (GH-SDEP), during the first 6 h of the light phase, after which they were allowed to sleep. Other rats performed the 6 h ICSS and 1 w later were subjected to 6 h of noncontingent stimulation (NCS). During NCS the individual stimulation patterns recorded during ICSS were replayed.
After GH-SDEP, ICSS, or NCS, time in nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep increased. Further, in the 24 h after SDEP, rats recovered all of the REM sleep lost during SDEP, but only 75% to 80% of the NREM sleep lost, regardless of the SDEP method. The magnitude of EEG slow wave responses occurring during NREM sleep also increased after SDEP treatments. However, NREM sleep EEG slow wave activity (SWA) responses were attenuated following ICSS, compared to GH-SDEP and NCS.
We conclude that ICSS and NCS can be used to sleep deprive rats. Changes in rebound NREM sleep EEG SWA occurring after ICSS, NCS, and GH-SDEP suggest that nonspecific effects of the SDEP procedure differentially affect recovery sleep phenotypes.
与人类睡眠剥夺(SDEP)不同,动物睡眠剥夺是不由自主的,涉及反复暴露于厌恶刺激,包括动物无法控制清醒刺激。因此,我们探索了颅内自我刺激(ICSS),一种操作性行为,作为啮齿动物自愿性睡眠剥夺的方法。
将雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠植入脑电图/肌电图(EEG/EMG)记录电极和一个单侧双极电极至下丘脑外侧。大鼠在光照期的前6小时被允许自我刺激,或接受轻柔处理诱导的睡眠剥夺(GH-SDEP),之后它们被允许睡眠。其他大鼠进行6小时的ICSS,1周后接受6小时的非条件刺激(NCS)。在NCS期间,重放ICSS期间记录的个体刺激模式。
在GH-SDEP、ICSS或NCS后,非快速眼动(NREM)睡眠和快速眼动(REM)睡眠的时间增加。此外,在睡眠剥夺后的24小时内,无论采用何种睡眠剥夺方法,大鼠恢复了睡眠剥夺期间失去的所有REM睡眠,但仅恢复了失去的NREM睡眠的75%至80%。睡眠剥夺处理后,NREM睡眠期间出现的脑电图慢波反应幅度也增加。然而,与GH-SDEP和NCS相比,ICSS后NREM睡眠脑电图慢波活动(SWA)反应减弱。
我们得出结论,ICSS和NCS可用于剥夺大鼠睡眠。ICSS、NCS和GH-SDEP后出现的NREM睡眠脑电图SWA反弹变化表明,睡眠剥夺程序的非特异性效应差异影响恢复睡眠表型。