Startup M
School of Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK.
Br J Med Psychol. 2000 Dec;73(4):553-7; discussion 559-60. doi: 10.1348/000711200160615.
Recently Riding and Cartwright (1999) have advocated eight new subscales of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, to be derived from a 40-item short-form (the IIP-40). The aims of this rejoinder are to examine critically the rationale given by Riding and Cartright for constructing new subscales based on Birtchnell's interpersonal octagon, the methods they used for the construction, and the evidence they provided for validity. The conclusions of this examination are that the rationale is weak and that the evidence is against the validity of the IIP-40.
最近，赖丁和卡特赖特（1999年）主张从包含40个条目的简版（人际问题量表-40，IIP - 40）中衍生出人际问题量表的八个新子量表。这一回应的目的是批判性地审视赖丁和卡特赖特基于伯奇内尔人际八角形构建新子量表的基本原理、他们所使用的构建方法以及他们所提供的效度证据。本次审视的结论是，其基本原理不充分，且证据不利于人际问题量表-40的效度。
