• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
More good than harm: a randomised controlled trial of the effect of education about familial risk of diabetes on psychological outcomes.益处多于害处:关于糖尿病家族风险教育对心理结果影响的随机对照试验
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Nov;50(460):867-71.
2
Risk and prevention of type II diabetes: offspring's views.2型糖尿病的风险与预防:子代的观点
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Mar;51(464):194-9.
3
The effect of depression on quality of life of patients with type II diabetes mellitus.抑郁症对2型糖尿病患者生活质量的影响。
Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(2):98-106. doi: 10.1002/da.20288.
4
The ProActive trial protocol - a randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of a family-based, domiciliary intervention programme to increase physical activity among individuals at high risk of diabetes [ISRCTN61323766].积极预防试验方案——一项基于家庭的居家干预项目提高糖尿病高危个体身体活动水平疗效的随机对照试验[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN61323766]
BMC Public Health. 2004 Oct 18;4:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-48.
5
Improving care of patients with diabetes and CKD: a pilot study for a cluster-randomized trial.改善糖尿病和慢性肾脏病患者的护理:一项整群随机试验的试点研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 May;51(5):777-88. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.12.039.
6
Families at high and low risk for depression: a 3-generation study.抑郁症高风险和低风险家庭:一项三代人的研究。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;62(1):29-36. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.1.29.
7
Closing the gap between literature and practice: evaluation of a teaching programme (in the absence of a structured treatment) on both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.弥合文献与实践之间的差距:对一项针对1型和2型糖尿病(在缺乏结构化治疗的情况下)的教学计划的评估。
Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2003 Oct-Dec;16(5-6):298-305.
8
Anxiety and depression symptoms in patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者的焦虑和抑郁症状
Diabet Med. 2009 Feb;26(2):153-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02648.x.
9
Genetics, obesity, and environmental risk factors associated with type 2 diabetes.与2型糖尿病相关的遗传学、肥胖及环境风险因素。
Croat Med J. 2005 Apr;46(2):302-7.
10
Familial factors in diabetic nephropathy: an offspring study.糖尿病肾病中的家族因素:一项后代研究。
Diabet Med. 2006 Mar;23(3):331-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01803.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Decision-Making About Self-Disclosure of a Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study.2型糖尿病诊断自我披露的患者决策:一项定性研究。
Diabetes Spectr. 2022 Summer;35(3):327-334. doi: 10.2337/ds21-0043. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
2
Knowledge about the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Visiting the Outpatient Clinics at Tertiary Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯利雅得的一家三级医院的门诊就诊的 2 型糖尿病成人的心血管疾病风险知识:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 20;19(9):4996. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094996.
3
An assessment of genetic counseling services for individuals with multiple sclerosis.针对多发性硬化症患者的遗传咨询服务评估。
J Genet Couns. 2015 Feb;24(1):46-57. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9735-2. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
4
Determinants of diabetes knowledge in a cohort of Nigerian diabetics.尼日利亚糖尿病患者队列中糖尿病知识的决定因素
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2014 Mar 4;13(1):39. doi: 10.1186/2251-6581-13-39.
5
The effect of genetic counseling for adult offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes on attitudes toward diabetes and its heredity: a randomized controlled trial.2型糖尿病患者成年子女的遗传咨询对其糖尿病态度及其遗传的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Genet Couns. 2014 Oct;23(5):762-9. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9680-5. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
6
Genomic counseling: next generation counseling.基因组咨询:下一代咨询。
J Genet Couns. 2014 Aug;23(4):689-92. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9641-z. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
7
Using web-based familial risk information for diabetes prevention: a randomized controlled trial.利用基于网络的家族糖尿病风险信息进行糖尿病预防:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 17;13:485. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-485.
8
Health care providers' perspective on using family history in the prevention of type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study including different disciplines.卫生保健提供者在 2 型糖尿病预防中使用家族史的观点:一项包含不同学科的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Mar 7;14:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-31.
9
DiAlert: a prevention program for overweight first degree relatives of type 2 diabetes patients: results of a pilot study to test feasibility and acceptability.DiAlert:2 型糖尿病患者超重一级亲属的预防计划:测试可行性和可接受性的试点研究结果。
Trials. 2012 Sep 27;13:178. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-178.
10
Randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of genetic counseling and a distance, computer-based, lifestyle intervention program for adult offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes: background, study protocol, and baseline patient characteristics.2型糖尿病患者成年子女的遗传咨询及远程计算机辅助生活方式干预项目有效性的随机对照试验:背景、研究方案及患者基线特征
J Nutr Metab. 2012;2012:831735. doi: 10.1155/2012/831735. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Anxiety among women with mild dyskaryosis: a randomized trial of an educational intervention.轻度宫颈上皮内瘤变女性的焦虑情绪:一项教育干预的随机试验
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 May;49(442):348-52.
2
Our Healthier Nation: are general practitioners willing and able to deliver? A survey of attitudes to and involvement in health promotion and lifestyle counselling.我们更健康的国家:全科医生愿意并能够做到吗?对健康促进和生活方式咨询的态度及参与情况的调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Mar;49(440):187-90.
3
Diabetes mellitus in the family: perceptions of offspring's risk.
Diabet Med. 1999 May;16(5):431-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00085.x.
4
Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study.饮食和运动对糖耐量受损人群预防非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病的作用。大庆糖耐量受损和糖尿病研究。
Diabetes Care. 1997 Apr;20(4):537-44. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.4.537.
5
Stress and genetic testing for disease risk.压力与疾病风险的基因检测
Health Psychol. 1997 Jan;16(1):8-19. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.16.1.8.
6
BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.遗传性乳腺癌-卵巢癌家族中的BRCA1检测。一项关于患者决策及结果的前瞻性研究。
JAMA. 1996 Jun 26;275(24):1885-92.
7
Impaired glucose tolerance and NIDDM: does a lifestyle intervention program have an effect?糖耐量受损与非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病:生活方式干预计划是否有效?
Diabetes Care. 1994 Nov;17(11):1311-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.11.1311.
8
Risk of diabetes in offspring of parents with non-insulin-dependent diabetes.
Diabet Med. 1995 Jan;12(1):6-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb02054.x.
9
The hospital anxiety and depression scale.医院焦虑抑郁量表。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
10
Marked improvement in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in diabetic Australian aborigines after temporary reversion to traditional lifestyle.糖尿病澳大利亚原住民暂时恢复传统生活方式后,碳水化合物和脂质代谢有显著改善。
Diabetes. 1984 Jun;33(6):596-603. doi: 10.2337/diab.33.6.596.

益处多于害处:关于糖尿病家族风险教育对心理结果影响的随机对照试验

More good than harm: a randomised controlled trial of the effect of education about familial risk of diabetes on psychological outcomes.

作者信息

Pierce M, Ridout D, Harding D, Keen H, Bradley C

机构信息

Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, Imperial College School of Medicine, London.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Nov;50(460):867-71.

PMID:11141871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1313849/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Offspring of people with type 2 diabetes underestimate their risk of developing the disease and know little about primary prevention. However, education about risk might cause psychological harm.

AIM

To examine cognitive and psychological effects of education about personal risk.

METHOD

Patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited from randomly selected general practices. One of their adult offspring was randomly selected and randomly allocated into one of three groups: 1. Group 1: given an initial interview, education, and a final interview; 2. Group 2: given an initial and final interview; and 3. Group 3: given one interview only. Psychological outcomes were assessed using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) and Positive Well-Being Scale (PWB) scores.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine per cent (105/152) of eligible offspring participated. Ninety-one per cent (96/152) completed the study. Comparing first and final interviews, in Group 1, significantly fewer responders at final interview (after education) thought that their risk of developing diabetes was 'low' (65% versus 41%, P = 0.027), while in Group 2, there was no significant change in risk perception (P = 0.13). Significantly fewer people in the educated group (Group 1, final interview) than in the control group (Group 3) thought their risk of developing diabetes was 'low' (41% versus 77%, P = 0.002). Risk education did not affect total HAD scores or PWB scores significantly.

CONCLUSION

Educating offspring of people with type 2 diabetes in this way about their risk of diabetes and possible preventive strategies increases their perception of personal risk but does not cause psychological harm.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病患者的后代低估了自己患该病的风险,且对一级预防知之甚少。然而,关于风险的教育可能会造成心理伤害。

目的

研究关于个人风险的教育对认知和心理的影响。

方法

从随机选取的普通诊所招募2型糖尿病患者。随机选取他们的一名成年后代,并随机分配到三组中的一组:1. 第1组:接受初次访谈、教育和末次访谈;2. 第2组:接受初次和末次访谈;3. 第3组:仅接受一次访谈。使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD)和积极幸福感量表(PWB)评分评估心理结果。

结果

69%(105/152)符合条件的后代参与了研究。91%(96/152)完成了研究。比较初次和末次访谈,在第1组中,末次访谈(教育后)认为自己患糖尿病风险为“低”的应答者显著减少(65%对41%,P = 0.027),而在第2组中,风险认知无显著变化(P = 0.13)。与对照组(第3组)相比,接受教育组(第1组,末次访谈)中认为自己患糖尿病风险为“低”的人数显著更少(41%对77%,P = 0.002)。风险教育对HAD总分或PWB总分无显著影响。

结论

以这种方式对2型糖尿病患者的后代进行糖尿病风险及可能预防策略的教育,会增加他们对个人风险的认知,但不会造成心理伤害。