Case L, Smith T B
Department of Psychology, University of South Dakota, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Dec;68(6):1107-10. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.68.6.1107.
A number of authors have raised concerns over the external validity of psychological research. This study examined the extent to which empirical articles include human participants from diverse ethnic backgrounds. Articles published over a 5-year period in 14 selected journals representing 3 applied sub-disciplines of psychology were examined. Of the 2,536 articles coded, only 61% indicated the ethnicity of the participants. For those articles, the ethnic compositions approximated U.S. Census estimates, with the exception of an overrepresentation of African Americans and an underrepresentation of Hispanic Americans. The results imply that although the field is apparently adequately recruiting English speakers, representation of non-English speakers should be increased. To further enhance the external validity of psychological research, ethnicity of participants should be not only specified but also analyzed in relation to the results of a study.
一些作者对心理学研究的外部效度表示担忧。本研究考察了实证性文章纳入不同种族背景人类参与者的程度。对在代表心理学3个应用子学科的14种选定期刊上发表的5年期文章进行了考察。在编码的2536篇文章中,只有61%表明了参与者的种族。对于那些文章,种族构成大致接近美国人口普查估计数,但非裔美国人的比例过高,西班牙裔美国人的比例过低。结果表明,尽管该领域显然充分招募了说英语的人,但说非英语者的比例应予以提高。为了进一步提高心理学研究的外部效度,不仅应明确参与者的种族,还应根据研究结果进行分析。