• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳糜泻血清学检测的比较评估:欧洲标准化倡议

Comparative evaluation of serologic tests for celiac disease: a European initiative toward standardization.

作者信息

Stern M

机构信息

University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000 Nov;31(5):513-9. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200011000-00012.

DOI:10.1097/00005176-200011000-00012
PMID:11144436
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Serologic methods have been used widely to test for celiac disease and have gained importance in diagnostic definition and in new epidemiologic findings. However, there is no standardization, and there are no reference protocols and materials.

METHODS

The European working group on Serological Screening for Celiac Disease has defined robust noncommercial test protocols for immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgA gliadin antibodies and for IgA autoantibodies against endomysium and tissue transglutaminase. Standard curves were linear in the decisive range, and intra-assay variation coefficients were less than 5% to 10%. Calibration was performed with a group reference serum. Joint cutoff limits were used. Seven laboratories took part in the final collaborative study on 252 randomized sera classified by histology (103 pediatric and adult patients with active celiac disease, 89 disease control subjects, and 60 blood donors).

RESULTS

IgA autoantibodies against endomysium and tissue transglutaminase rendered superior sensitivity (90% and 93%, respectively) and specificity (99% and 95%, respectively) over IgA and IgG gliadin antibodies. Tissue transglutaminase antibody testing showed superior receiver operating characteristic performance compared with gliadin antibodies. The K values for interlaboratory reproducibility showed superiority for IgA endomysium (0.93) in comparison with tissue transglutaminase antibodies (0.83) and gliadin antibodies (0.82 for IgG, 0.62 for IgA).

CONCLUSIONS

Basic criteria of standardization and quality assessment must be fulfilled by any given test protocol proposed for serologic investigation of celiac disease. The working group has produced robust test protocols and reference materials available for standardization to further improve reliability of serologic testing for celiac disease.

摘要

背景

血清学方法已被广泛用于检测乳糜泻,在诊断定义和新的流行病学研究结果中具有重要意义。然而,目前尚无标准化方案,也没有参考方案和材料。

方法

欧洲乳糜泻血清学筛查工作组已为免疫球蛋白(Ig)G和IgA麦醇溶蛋白抗体以及抗肌内膜和组织转谷氨酰胺酶的IgA自身抗体定义了可靠的非商业检测方案。标准曲线在决定性范围内呈线性,批内变异系数小于5%至10%。使用一组参考血清进行校准。采用联合临界值。七个实验室参与了对252份按组织学分类的随机血清的最终协作研究(103例患有活动性乳糜泻的儿科和成人患者、89例疾病对照受试者和60名献血者)。

结果

与IgA和IgG麦醇溶蛋白抗体相比,抗肌内膜和组织转谷氨酰胺酶的IgA自身抗体具有更高的敏感性(分别为90%和93%)和特异性(分别为99%和95%)。与麦醇溶蛋白抗体相比,组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体检测显示出更好的受试者操作特征性能。实验室间重复性的K值显示,IgA肌内膜(0.93)优于组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体(0.83)和麦醇溶蛋白抗体(IgG为0.82,IgA为0.62)。

结论

任何用于乳糜泻血清学调查的特定检测方案都必须满足标准化和质量评估的基本标准。该工作组已制定了可靠的检测方案和可供标准化使用的参考材料,以进一步提高乳糜泻血清学检测的可靠性。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of serologic tests for celiac disease: a European initiative toward standardization.乳糜泻血清学检测的比较评估:欧洲标准化倡议
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000 Nov;31(5):513-9. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200011000-00012.
2
Validation of Antibody-Based Strategies for Diagnosis of Pediatric Celiac Disease Without Biopsy.基于抗体的策略在儿科乳糜泻诊断中的验证:无需活检。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Aug;153(2):410-419.e17. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
3
Novel assay for detecting celiac disease-associated autoantibodies in dermatitis herpetiformis using deamidated gliadin-analogous fusion peptides.利用脱酰胺麦谷蛋白类似融合肽检测疱疹样皮炎中与乳糜泻相关的自身抗体的新方法。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Apr;66(4):583-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.02.025. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
4
Celiac disease and immunoglobulin a deficiency: how effective are the serological methods of diagnosis?乳糜泻与免疫球蛋白A缺乏症:血清学诊断方法的有效性如何?
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 Nov;9(6):1295-300. doi: 10.1128/cdli.9.6.1295-1300.2002.
5
Diagnostic utility of deamidated gliadin peptide antibody in celiac disease compared to anti-tissue transglutaminase and IgA- endomysium antibodies.与抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体和IgA-肌内膜抗体相比,脱酰胺麦醇溶蛋白肽抗体在乳糜泻中的诊断效用。
Egypt J Immunol. 2012;19(2):41-52.
6
Extension of the celiac intestinal antibody (CIA) pattern through eight antibody assessments in fecal supernatants from patients with celiac disease.通过对乳糜泻患者粪便上清液进行八项抗体评估来扩展乳糜泻肠道抗体(CIA)模式。
Immunobiology. 2016 Jan;221(1):63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2015.07.021. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
7
Celiac G+ antibody assay for the detection of autoantibodies in celiac disease.用于检测乳糜泻自身抗体的乳糜泻G+抗体检测法。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Sep;1173:36-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04848.x.
8
Tissue transglutaminase antibodies in celiac disease, comparison of an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and a dot blot assay.乳糜泻中的组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体:酶联免疫吸附测定法与斑点印迹法的比较
Pathol Biol (Paris). 2005 May;53(4):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2004.07.022.
9
Accuracy in Diagnosis of Celiac Disease Without Biopsies in Clinical Practice.临床实践中无活检测情况下对乳糜泻的诊断准确性。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Oct;153(4):924-935. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
10
Tissue transglutaminase antibody determination in celiac disease. Analysis of diagnostic specificity of anti-human IgA-type assays.乳糜泻中组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体的测定。抗人IgA类检测方法的诊断特异性分析。
J Immunoassay Immunochem. 2002;23(2):211-27. doi: 10.1081/IAS-120003662.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-Celiac Villous Atrophy-A Problem Still Underestimated.非乳糜泻性绒毛萎缩——一个仍被低估的问题。
Life (Basel). 2025 Jul 13;15(7):1098. doi: 10.3390/life15071098.
2
Clinical presentations and outcomes of celiac disease in children and adolescents at a tertiary care center in Lebanon.黎巴嫩一家三级医疗中心儿童和青少年乳糜泻的临床表现及治疗结果
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jan 22;13:1527114. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1527114. eCollection 2025.
3
The role of serology in the diagnosis of coeliac disease.血清学在乳糜泻诊断中的作用。
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2023;16(2):118-128. doi: 10.22037/ghfbb.v16i2.2713.
4
Current guidelines for the management of celiac disease: A systematic review with comparative analysis.当前乳糜泻管理指南:系统评价与比较分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 7;28(1):154-175. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i1.154.
5
The Progression of Celiac Disease, Diagnostic Modalities, and Treatment Options.乳糜泻的进展、诊断方式和治疗选择。
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2021 Jan-Dec;9:23247096211053702. doi: 10.1177/23247096211053702.
6
Value of biopsy in a cohort of children with high-titer celiac serologies: observation of dynamic policy differences between Europe and North America.高滴度乳糜泻血清学患儿活检的价值:观察欧洲和北美之间动态政策差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 20;20(1):962. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05815-0.
7
Celiac disease and Sjögren's syndrome: A case report and review of literature.乳糜泻与干燥综合征:一例病例报告及文献综述
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Sep 26;8(18):4151-4161. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.4151.
8
Celiac disease: a comprehensive current review.乳糜泻:全面的最新综述。
BMC Med. 2019 Jul 23;17(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1380-z.
9
Automatic classification of IgA endomysial antibody test for celiac disease: a new method deploying machine learning.自动分类 IgA 肠内膜抗体试验用于乳糜泻:一种新的机器学习方法。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 25;9(1):9217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45679-x.
10
Prevalence and Clinical Features of Celiac Disease in Healthy School-Aged Children.学龄期健康儿童中乳糜泻的患病率及临床特征。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Jan;64(1):173-181. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5320-0. Epub 2018 Oct 12.