• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗补助资格与儿童门诊治疗敏感型住院的发生率

Medicaid eligibility and the incidence of ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations for children.

作者信息

Kaestner R, Joyce T, Racine A

机构信息

Baruch College, New York, NY 10010, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jan;52(2):305-13. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00133-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00133-7
PMID:11144786
Abstract

In this study we investigate the effect of Medicaid on children's health, as measured by the incidence of ambulatory care sensitive (ACS) hospitalizations in the USA. The use of ACS hospitalizations is a unique contribution of our study. ACS discharges are known to be sensitive to better primary care and greater medical intervention and are objective measures of children's health. The results of this analysis were mixed. We found relatively robust evidence that the Medicaid expansions decreased the incidence of ACS hospitalizations among children age 2-6 from very low-income areas. For other groups of children, our results were less consistent. There was some evidence, although not uniform, that the Medicaid expansions improved the health of children age 2-6 from what we refer to as near-poor areas, areas with a median family income between $25,000 and 30,000. For older children, age 7-9, we found little evidence that the Medicaid expansions improved their health.

摘要

在本研究中,我们通过美国门诊护理敏感型(ACS)住院率来调查医疗补助对儿童健康的影响。使用ACS住院率是我们研究的独特贡献。已知ACS出院情况对更好的初级保健和更多的医疗干预敏感,并且是儿童健康的客观指标。该分析结果喜忧参半。我们发现了相对有力的证据,表明医疗补助扩大降低了来自极低收入地区的2至6岁儿童的ACS住院率。对于其他儿童群体,我们的结果不太一致。有一些证据(尽管并不统一)表明,医疗补助扩大改善了来自我们所称的近贫地区(家庭收入中位数在25,000美元至30,000美元之间)的2至6岁儿童的健康状况。对于7至9岁的大龄儿童,我们几乎没有发现证据表明医疗补助扩大改善了他们的健康状况。

相似文献

1
Medicaid eligibility and the incidence of ambulatory care sensitive hospitalizations for children.医疗补助资格与儿童门诊治疗敏感型住院的发生率
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Jan;52(2):305-13. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00133-7.
2
Medicaid re-enrollment policies and children's risk of hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.医疗补助重新登记政策与儿童因门诊护理敏感病症而住院的风险
Med Care. 2008 Oct;46(10):1049-54. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318185ce24.
3
Spillover Effects of Adult Medicaid Expansions on Children's Use of Preventive Services.成人医疗补助计划扩张对儿童预防性服务使用的溢出效应。
Pediatrics. 2017 Dec;140(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0953. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
Impact of a Medicaid primary care provider and preventive care on pediatric hospitalization.医疗补助初级保健提供者及预防保健对儿科住院治疗的影响。
Pediatrics. 1998 Mar;101(3):E1. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.3.e1.
5
The impact of Medicaid managed care on hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.医疗补助管理式医疗对门诊治疗敏感型疾病住院率的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Feb;40(1):19-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00340.x.
6
The Effects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on Children's Health Coverage.《平价医疗法案》对儿童健康保险的影响。
Med Care. 2019 Feb;57(2):115-122. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001021.
7
The ABCs of children's health care: how the Medicaid expansions affected access, burdens, and coverage between 1987 and 1996.儿童医疗保健的基本要素:1987年至1996年间医疗补助计划扩张对可及性、负担及覆盖范围的影响
Inquiry. 2003 Summer;40(2):133-45. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_40.2.133.
8
Effect of expanding medicaid for parents on children's health insurance coverage: lessons from the Oregon experiment.扩大父母医疗补助对儿童健康保险覆盖范围的影响:俄勒冈试验的经验教训。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jan;169(1):e143145. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3145. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
9
Financial burden of raising CSHCN: association with state policy choices.养育有特殊医疗需求儿童的经济负担:与州政策选择的关联。
Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124 Suppl 4:S435-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1255P.
10
Reporting on continuity of coverage for children in Medicaid and CHIP: what states can learn from monitoring continuity and duration of coverage.报告医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划中儿童的参保连续性:各州可以从监测参保连续性和持续时间中学到什么。
Acad Pediatr. 2011 Jul-Aug;11(4):318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.05.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Enhanced Outpatient Pooling Level on Healthcare Utilization, Costs and Fund Expenditures in China: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.提高门诊统筹水平对中国医疗服务利用、成本及基金支出的影响:一项中断时间序列分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Sep 10;18:2977-2989. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S541047. eCollection 2025.
2
Does outpatient mutual-aid reduce oncology patients' utilization of inpatient services?-An empirical study of outpatient mutual-aid policy in Wuhan, China.门诊互助是否会降低肿瘤患者的住院服务利用率?——中国武汉门诊互助政策的实证研究
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025 Jan;40(1):174-193. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3858. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
3
Outpatient healthcare access and utilization for neonatal abstinence syndrome children: A systematic review.
新生儿戒断综合征患儿的门诊医疗服务可及性与利用情况:一项系统综述
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Aug 29;4(5):389-397. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.407.
4
Lifetime Consequences of Early-Life and Midlife Access to Health Insurance: A Review.早年及中年时期获得医疗保险的终生影响:一项综述
Med Care Res Rev. 2018 Dec;75(6):655-720. doi: 10.1177/1077558717740444. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
5
Did Health Care Reform Help Kentucky Address Disparities in Coverage and Access to Care among the Poor?医疗改革是否有助于肯塔基州解决贫困人群在覆盖范围和获得医疗服务方面的差距?
Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):1387-1406. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12699. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
6
Missed well-child care visits, low continuity of care, and risk of ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations in young children.幼儿错过健康儿童保健访视、医疗连续性低以及门诊医疗敏感型住院风险
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Nov;164(11):1052-8. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.201.
7
Health insurance and ex ante moral hazard: evidence from Medicare.医疗保险与事前道德风险:来自医疗保险制度的证据
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2009 Dec;9(4):367-90. doi: 10.1007/s10754-009-9056-4. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
8
The effect of new insurance coverage on the health status of low-income children in Santa Clara County.新保险覆盖范围对圣克拉拉县低收入儿童健康状况的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr;42(2):867-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00625.x.
9
Disparities in children's use of oral health services.儿童口腔健康服务使用情况的差异。
Public Health Rep. 2005 Jul-Aug;120(4):455-62. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000413.