Pelegrina S, Bajo M T, Justicia F
Universidad de Jaén, Spain.
Memory. 2000 Nov;8(6):377-92. doi: 10.1080/09658210050156831.
The results of many experiments have shown that although people distribute their study time depending on the perceived difficulty of the materials, they do not succeed in compensating for this difficulty (e.g., Mazzoni & Cornoldi, 1993). The purpose of this paper was to explore possible ways to induce compensation. The objective difficulty of the items was varied by manipulating their concreteness. In Experiment 1, we explored whether compensation could be increased through practice. In Experiment 2, predictive memory judgements were obtained to determine to what extent participants were sensitive to the characteristics of the material that made it difficult. Finally, in Experiment 3, participants were given instructions designed to achieve complete compensation. Results showed that although participants' judgements of learning and their allocation of time were sensitive to the objective difficulty of the materials, this knowledge was not spontaneously used to compensate. Thus, even with practice participants recalled more easy items than difficult ones. Only instructions that induced greater awareness of the nature of the material were able to produce complete compensation.
许多实验结果表明,尽管人们会根据材料的感知难度来分配学习时间,但他们并未成功弥补这种难度(例如,马佐尼和科尔诺尔迪,1993年)。本文的目的是探索诱导补偿的可能方法。通过操纵项目的具体性来改变项目的客观难度。在实验1中,我们探究了是否可以通过练习来增加补偿。在实验2中,获得了预测性记忆判断,以确定参与者对使材料变得困难的特征的敏感程度。最后,在实验3中,向参与者给出旨在实现完全补偿的指导语。结果表明,尽管参与者对学习的判断及其时间分配对材料的客观难度敏感,但这种认知并未被自发地用于补偿。因此,即使经过练习,参与者回忆起的简单项目仍比困难项目多。只有那些能使人们更清楚地意识到材料性质的指导语才能产生完全补偿。