[关于宪法法院1999年6月17日就针对1988年11月第35号辅助生殖技术法提出的第376/89号违宪申诉所做裁决的评论]

[Commentary on the decision of the Constitutional Court of June 17, 1999 resolving the Recourse of Inconstitutionality no. 376/89 against the 35/1988 law of November on assisted reproduction techniques].

作者信息

Vidal Martínez J

机构信息

Universitat de València, España.

出版信息

Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2000 Jan-Jun(12):113-37.

Abstract

The author discusses the ruling by the Spanish Constitutional Court (116/99, 17 June) in the matter of the challenge on grounds of alleged inconstitutionality lodged against the Law on Assisted Reproduction Techniques back in 1989. Other circumstances concerning the application and development of said law are examined also and a detailed critical study is made of the legal points used in the Ruling. The article concludes with some thoughts on the main issues arising therefrom.

摘要

作者探讨了西班牙宪法法院（116/99，6月17日）对1989年有人以涉嫌违宪为由对《辅助生殖技术法》提出质疑一事所做出的裁决。文中还研究了该法律在应用和发展方面的其他情况，并对裁决中所使用的法律要点进行了详细的批判性研究。文章最后对由此产生的主要问题进行了一些思考。

相似文献

1

[Commentary on the decision of the Constitutional Court of June 17, 1999 resolving the Recourse of Inconstitutionality no. 376/89 against the 35/1988 law of November on assisted reproduction techniques].[关于宪法法院1999年6月17日就针对1988年11月第35号辅助生殖技术法提出的第376/89号违宪申诉所做裁决的评论]

Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2000 Jan-Jun(12):113-37.

2

[Genetic reading of the decision of the Constitutional Court on the appeal on unconstitutionality against Law 35/1988 on Assisted Reproduction Techniques].[宪法法院对针对1988年第35号关于辅助生殖技术的法律违宪上诉的裁决的遗传学解读]

Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 1999 Jul-Dec(11):145-52.

3

[The Constitutional Court and new scenarios of biomedicine. (Constitutional reflections on the decision of the Constitutional Tribunal 116/1999, June 17)].[宪法法院与生物医学新情况。（关于宪法法庭1999年6月17日第116/1999号裁决的宪法思考）]

Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2000 Jan-Jun(12):91-111.

4

[The pending problems of the Spanish legal regulation on assisted human reproduction: the decision of the Constitutional Court and the report of the National Commission on Assisted Human Reproduction].[西班牙辅助人类生殖法律规定的悬而未决问题：宪法法院的裁决及国家辅助人类生殖委员会的报告]

Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2000 Jan-Jun(12):47-66 cont..

5

[The Constitutional Court regarding Assisted Reproduction Techniques: a critical assessment].[宪法法院关于辅助生殖技术：批判性评估]

Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 1999 Jul-Dec(11):119-44.

6

[The problems of Spanish legal regulation on assisted human reproduction: the decision of the Constitutional Court and the first report of the National Commission of Assisted Reproduction (Part II)].[西班牙辅助人类生殖法律监管问题：宪法法院的裁决及辅助生殖国家委员会的首份报告（第二部分）]

Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2000 Jul-Dec(13):103-18.

7

[Decision of the Constitutional Court 116/1999 of June 17, 1999. Appeal on unconstitutionality against Law 35/88, of November 22, regarding Assisted Reproduction Techniques].

Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 1999 Jul-Dec(11):97-117.

8

Access to medical-assisted reproduction and pgd in Italian law: a deadly blow to an illiberal statute? commentary to the European Court on Human Rights's decision Costa and Pavan v Italy (ECtHR, 28 August 2012, App. 54270/2010).意大利法律中的医学辅助生殖及植入前基因诊断：对一项不自由法规的致命打击？对欧洲人权法院“科斯塔和帕万诉意大利案”（欧洲人权法院，2012年8月28日，申请号54270/2010）判决的评论

Med Law Rev. 2013 Summer;21(3):474-86. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwt010. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

9

Spanish Constitutional Court. Ruling of 19 of December of 1996. the challenge on the grounds of inconstitutionality against law 42/1988, of 28 December, regulating the donation and use of human embryos and foetuses or the cells, tissues or organs therefrom.西班牙宪法法院。1996年12月19日的裁决。针对1988年12月28日关于规范人类胚胎和胎儿及其细胞、组织或器官的捐赠与使用的第42/1988号法律提出的违宪质疑。

Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 1998 Jan-Jun(8):119-33.

10

The shadowlands--secrets, lies, and assisted reproduction.阴影之地——秘密、谎言与辅助生殖

N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 24;339(13):935-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809243391325.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。