MuñozCodoceo R
Sección de Neumología, Hospital Infantil Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain.
An Esp Pediatr. 2000 Dec;53(6):547-52.
Polygraphy enables differentiation between primary snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). A clinical score (Brouillette Index) has been proposed that could be useful in classifying children suspected of suffering from this disorder and in reducing the number of polysomnographic studies.
We evaluated 192 consecutive children with adenoton-sillar hypertrophy and with no craniofacial abnormalities or other associated diseases referred to our pediatric respiratory clinic for suspected OSAS. The Brouillette Index (BI) was used to classify the patients into a) non-OSAS (BI < neg 1), b) uncertain OSAS (BI between neg 1 and 3.5 and c) OSAS (BI > 3.5). For the polygraphic diagnosis we analyzed two different criteria for differentiating between OSAS and primary snoring: a respiratory distress index (RDI) >= 3 or >= 5.
The BI correctly classified only 23% of the patients with suspected OSAS. In the great majority of the children, polysomnographic monitoring was needed to differentiate between OSAS and primary snoring. In one group of children (10.9% or 6.4% depending on the diagnostic criteria), the BI would have led to incorrect classification.
The BI is not an efficient tool for discriminating between primary snoring and OSAS in an outpatient pediatric respiratory clinic.
多导睡眠图可区分原发性打鼾和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)。已提出一种临床评分(布罗伊lette指数),其可能有助于对疑似患有该疾病的儿童进行分类,并减少多导睡眠图研究的数量。
我们评估了192名连续的患有腺样体扁桃体肥大且无颅面异常或其他相关疾病的儿童,这些儿童因疑似OSAS转诊至我们的儿科呼吸诊所。布罗伊lette指数(BI)用于将患者分为:a)非OSAS(BI < -1),b)不确定的OSAS(BI在-1至3.5之间)和c)OSAS(BI > 3.5)。对于多导睡眠图诊断,我们分析了两种区分OSAS和原发性打鼾的不同标准:呼吸窘迫指数(RDI)>= 3或>= 5。
BI仅正确分类了23%的疑似OSAS患者。在绝大多数儿童中,需要多导睡眠图监测来区分OSAS和原发性打鼾。在一组儿童中(根据诊断标准为10.9%或6.4%),BI会导致错误分类。
在儿科呼吸门诊中,BI不是区分原发性打鼾和OSAS的有效工具。